2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2012.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration uncertainty estimation of a strain-gage external balance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Strutz (2016), where B is the least squares estimator of B, W j is the weighting matrix for a particular degree of freedom (DOF), j, and the overbar indicates averaged quantities over all calibration runs (five in total). As suggested by Reis et al (2013), the weighting matrix is computed as the sum of the error contributions due to weights and the wire-pulley setup V w , such as misalignments and friction forces, and the variance in the readings of the strain sensors V r . Accordingly, The second term on the RHS of Eq.…”
Section: Static Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From Strutz (2016), where B is the least squares estimator of B, W j is the weighting matrix for a particular degree of freedom (DOF), j, and the overbar indicates averaged quantities over all calibration runs (five in total). As suggested by Reis et al (2013), the weighting matrix is computed as the sum of the error contributions due to weights and the wire-pulley setup V w , such as misalignments and friction forces, and the variance in the readings of the strain sensors V r . Accordingly, The second term on the RHS of Eq.…”
Section: Static Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential errors induced by wire misalignments, friction of the pulley and weight application are all factored into the covariance matrix W j . Further details can be found in Reis et al (2013). u (a+b) amounts to approximately 97% of the total variance at low Re but only 30% at higher values.…”
Section: Contributions (A) and (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difficulty comes from the fact that operating conditions concerns rarefied regime with low density flows, giving force values estimated between 1mN and 1 N. Aerodynamic balances applied to supersonic wind tunnels are ranged in two main balance groups' internal and external balances. Internal balances [32] are a test model extension and located inside the test section, on the contrary, external [33] are placed outside the test section and the model is supported with thin wires. For the present study, a sting balance was designed to measure drag and lift forces applied to the waveriders in supersonic and hypersonic flows.…”
Section: The Sting Balance Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expressed by Belter (1998) at the Boeing Aerodynamics Laboratory, obtaining the precision limit of the force measurements from the balance calibration residuals generally yields the most conservative estimates of repeatability. The other more involved methods of obtaining the balance uncertainty rely on the uncertainties of the curve fitting parameters of the calibration matrix or the goodness of the fit of the leastsquare multivariate regression Reis et al, 2004;Kammeyer and Rueger, 2008;Reis, Castro and Mello, 2013). The application of these methodologies will result in balance uncertainties that depend on the readings of the strain gages during a test (Reis et al, 2002).…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%