1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6793(199608)13:5<517::aid-mar5>3.0.co;2-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A meta-analysis of consumer choice and subliminal advertising

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
11

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
33
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…This line of reasoning also suggests that careful consideration of implicit attitudes may shed light on potential effects of subliminal variables on brand evaluation. There has been much skepticism regarding the viability of subliminal techniques in the consumer domain (Moore 1982;Pratkanis and Greenwald 1988;Trappey 1996). Recent research, however, has uncovered some situations in which these effects may exist (Strahan, Spencer, andZanna 2002, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This line of reasoning also suggests that careful consideration of implicit attitudes may shed light on potential effects of subliminal variables on brand evaluation. There has been much skepticism regarding the viability of subliminal techniques in the consumer domain (Moore 1982;Pratkanis and Greenwald 1988;Trappey 1996). Recent research, however, has uncovered some situations in which these effects may exist (Strahan, Spencer, andZanna 2002, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brannon and Brock (1994) described the problem around the lacking reproduction of a subliminal persuasion effect, fittingly, as a script for a drama with three acts: First, observation of an effect in the field; second, demonstration of the effect in a laboratory analogue; third, subsequent failure to reproduce the effect. Therefore, the vast majority of the psychological community concluded that subliminal persuasion does not and could not work (for example Broyles, 2006;Dijksterhuis et al, 2005;George & Jennings, 1975;Moore, 1988;Pratkanis & Aronson, 1992;Pratkanis & Greenwald, 1988;Trappey, 1996).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En 1996 [23] se dio un nuevo paso para esclarecer el alcance de este tipo de actividades. El meta-análisis de Charles Trappery tuvo muy en cuenta los resultados de veintitrés experimentos distintos.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified