1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01703.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A meta‐analysis of change in marital and employment status as predictors of alcohol consumption on a typical occasion*

Abstract: Meta-analysis is used to combine results of primary data from 12 longitudinal studies to examine the consistency of results with respect to the role of changes on the individual level in marital status and employment status on changes in consumption of alcohol per typical occasion. The analyses control for the effects of Time 1 consumption per occasion and education. Not getting married and becoming unmarried are associated with increased consumption at follow-up and both variables are positively related to in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
114
3
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
8
114
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After analyzing the data, we found that a central result in this sample was that overall, when age, education level, and marital status were controlled for, parenthood was neither directly, nor conditionally, associated with alcohol intake per occasion. Although authors have previously pointed out that social roles have a conservative effect on overall drinking patterns (Celentano and McQueen, 1984;Paradis et al, 1999;Parker et al, 1980;Temple et al, 1991), our study indicates that, for both men and women, being the parent of a child younger than the age of 18 living at home is not signifi cantly related to alcohol intake per occasion. More to the point in this study, we found that drinking contexts significantly infl uenced alcohol intake per occasion, but results of multilevel analyses provided very limited support for a moderator role for drinking contexts on the parenthood-alcohol intake relationship.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…After analyzing the data, we found that a central result in this sample was that overall, when age, education level, and marital status were controlled for, parenthood was neither directly, nor conditionally, associated with alcohol intake per occasion. Although authors have previously pointed out that social roles have a conservative effect on overall drinking patterns (Celentano and McQueen, 1984;Paradis et al, 1999;Parker et al, 1980;Temple et al, 1991), our study indicates that, for both men and women, being the parent of a child younger than the age of 18 living at home is not signifi cantly related to alcohol intake per occasion. More to the point in this study, we found that drinking contexts significantly infl uenced alcohol intake per occasion, but results of multilevel analyses provided very limited support for a moderator role for drinking contexts on the parenthood-alcohol intake relationship.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Overall, dating and married couples exhibit different patterns of alcohol consumption because married couples tend to drink less (Bachman et al, 1996;Leonard and Mudar, 2003;Miller-Tutzauer et al, 1991;Temple et al, 1991). In addition, major life events, such as parenthood, may set married couples apart from dating or cohabiting couples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with light drinkers or abstainers, heavy or problem drinkers report more partner confl ict and relationship dissatisfaction (Leonard and Eiden, 2007;Whisman, 2007); they are less likely to marry and, if they do, more likely to divorce, as are users of illicit drugs (Amato and Rogers, 1997;Chilcoat and Breslau, 1996;Hajema and Knibbe, 1998;Newcomb, 1994;Power et al, 1999;Temple et al, 1991;Yamaguchi and Kandel, 1997). Individuals who smoke are also more likely to divorce (Doherty and Doherty, 1998), especially those who initiate smoking during adolescence (Chassin et al, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%