2004
DOI: 10.1109/lpt.2004.824647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A MEMS-Based VOA With Very Low PDL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 a CCD image of initial state of bright type VOA driven by a forward moving V-beam actuator; b CCD image of actuated state of bright type VOA driven by a forward moving V-beam actuator; c CCD image of initial state of dark type VOA driven by a backward moving V-beam actuator; d CCD image of actuated state of dark type VOA driven by a backward moving V-beam actuator much better PDL characteristics than the ones based on two reflection mirrors, e.g., retro-reflection type Lee 2006b). The rather low PDL for single reflection mirror type of devices has been reported by Bashir et al (2004) based on an electrostatic comb drive actuated reflective mirror, where the PDL is reported to be less than 0.1 dB for attenuation of less than 30 dB. The return loss is measured as small as 49~52 dB within 30 dB attenuation range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 a CCD image of initial state of bright type VOA driven by a forward moving V-beam actuator; b CCD image of actuated state of bright type VOA driven by a forward moving V-beam actuator; c CCD image of initial state of dark type VOA driven by a backward moving V-beam actuator; d CCD image of actuated state of dark type VOA driven by a backward moving V-beam actuator much better PDL characteristics than the ones based on two reflection mirrors, e.g., retro-reflection type Lee 2006b). The rather low PDL for single reflection mirror type of devices has been reported by Bashir et al (2004) based on an electrostatic comb drive actuated reflective mirror, where the PDL is reported to be less than 0.1 dB for attenuation of less than 30 dB. The return loss is measured as small as 49~52 dB within 30 dB attenuation range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Thus MEMS VOAs can reduce incoming light intensity in an analog control manner regardless the difference of wavelength and protocol. The function of controllably attenuating a light beam can be achieved by various methods, among previously reported MEMS VOAs, such as, by partially blocking the beam via inserting a beam shutter into the light beam path, i.e., the planar shutter type (Barber et al 1998;Marxer et al 1999;Liu et al 2003;Kim et al 2004); by changing the position of one or two in-plane movable mirrors relative to input/output fibers, to alter the coupling efficiency of light from/toward the fibers in terms of one reflection or two reflections configurations, respectively, i.e., the planar reflection (Chen et al 2003a, b;Lee 2005a;Bashir et al 2004)and retroreflection types Lee 2005b); by using an axial moving elliptical-mirror to modify the focal spot of reflected light beam toward the output fiber (Cai et al 2005); and by adopting a three-dimensional (3D) tilted mirror to redirect the reflected light beam direction toward the output fiber, where this tilted mirror is placed facing a convergent lens in front of end faces of two parallel fibers in a 3D configuration (Robinson 2000;Costello et al 2003;Isamoto et al 2004). All the aforementioned MEMS VOAs were based on electrostatic actuation mechanisms, i.e., the comb drive actuators and the parallel plate actuators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It points out the designs using single reflection mirror will derive better PDL characteristics than the ones based on two reflection mirrors. The rather low PDL for single reflection mirror type of devices has been reported by Bashir A. et al based on a electrostatic comb drive actuated reflective mirror [6], where the PDL is reported to be less than 0.1 dB for attenuation of less than 30 dB. The back-reflection loss (BR) is measured as large as 50 dB in most cases.…”
Section: Device Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…By contrast, free-space coupling elements are usually designed to mitigate optical beam divergence phenomena associated with Gaussian beam (GB) propagation and achieve phase/mode matching. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Photonic applications in which the sources and destinations are separated by a free-space optical path (OP) such as fiber to fiber, 4 laser to fiber, 5-7 photonic crystal to fiber, 8 waveguide to fiber, [9][10][11] laser to laser [12][13][14][15][16] and intra chip coupling 17 have been reported. In many applications, a high coupling efficiency over a relatively long OP, within the submillimeter range and sometimes extending up to the centimeter range, is critical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the coupling efficiency has a direct impact on the output power and tunable range of external cavity tunable lasers, 14 the finesse and free spectral range of Fabry-Pérot resonators 18 and the insertion loss and number of the input/output ports in optical switches, 19 as well as in optical interconnects. 17,20 Micro lenses in the form of lens array, 19 ball lenses, 21 graded-index lenses 4,11 or lensed fibers 22 are the most commonly used optical components for focusing and matching GBs. The use of lenses, however, increases the system complexity and cost due to the required assembly process, a major obstacle to system integration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%