2022
DOI: 10.1109/tbdata.2020.3048961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Memory Network Information Retrieval Model for Identification of News Misinformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of recurrent neural networks in this area is quite intensive ( [18] [19]), but most of these solutions are based on the use of truncated text inputs due to efficiency issues, with the consequent loss of information. This problem has been faced by using different approaches as in [20], where authors apply a two-stage stance detection process based on a simple information retrieval process that is able to use full articles, providing a a high accuracy following a real-life process of fact-checking.…”
Section: State-of-the-art and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of recurrent neural networks in this area is quite intensive ( [18] [19]), but most of these solutions are based on the use of truncated text inputs due to efficiency issues, with the consequent loss of information. This problem has been faced by using different approaches as in [20], where authors apply a two-stage stance detection process based on a simple information retrieval process that is able to use full articles, providing a a high accuracy following a real-life process of fact-checking.…”
Section: State-of-the-art and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fact-checking websites examine the news source to check the authenticity and accuracy of the online news [16]. Real-life fact-checking websites and fact verification datasets offered practical solutions to display the originality of the web-based news [19,44]. Automatic fake news detectors were highly instrumental in the war against digital fake news [17].…”
Section: Fact-checking Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep learning models and architectures, neural networks, and natural language processing facilitate in detecting fake news for stopping pernicious news on digital media [6,16,23]. Classification-based models, blockchain-based frameworks, machine learning, big data architectures, machine learning ensemble approach, and natural language processing technology are trending techniques for fake news prevention [5,7,13,19,24,29,38]. Machine learning, deep learning methods, and real-world datasets are a productive source to find out fake news from the flood of misinformation [31,32].…”
Section: Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Algorithmic misinformation detection can be composed of many sub-tasks, which some systems tackle independently while others attempt to solve in an end-to-end fashion. While the specifics of these tasks may evolve and change over time, we draw from Guo et al [34] to differentiate between three core (sequential) tasks: (1) Check-worthiness, which aims to spot factual claims that are worthy of fact-checking [11,31,39,45], (2) Evidence retrieval of potential evidence for identified claims [21,49,56,60,66,70,74] , and (3) verdict prediction, which aims to establish the veracity of a claim [60,63,74]. In a survey on the topic by Zhou and Zafarani [78], the authors identify how misinformation can be detected from four perspectives: (1) the false knowledge it carries; (2) its writing style; (3) its propagation patterns; and (4) the credibility of its source.…”
Section: Algorithmic Misinformation Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%