2022
DOI: 10.1109/access.2022.3165226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conspiracy or Not? A Deep Learning Approach to Spot It on Twitter

Abstract: Sentiment analysis is an active topic in Natural Language Processing (NLP). It has attracted a significant interest of research community due to the wide range of applications, including social-media, fake news spotting and interactive applications. In this paper, we present a novel approach for semiautomatic background creation and conspiracy classification. For this purpose, a complete framework including novel recurrent models is proposed. The BORJIS: Best algorithm foR Joint conspiracy and sarcasm detectio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…compared accuracy with the other models which are using the same datasets. Further, to support the effectiveness of the suggested algorithm, we compared the experimental findings with the Fake News diagnosis parameters results in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score [22]. As we can see in fig.…”
Section: ) Isotmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…compared accuracy with the other models which are using the same datasets. Further, to support the effectiveness of the suggested algorithm, we compared the experimental findings with the Fake News diagnosis parameters results in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score [22]. As we can see in fig.…”
Section: ) Isotmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Existing literature often focuses on misinformation (Lin et al 2019;Kumar et al 2020) or specific conspiracy theories related to COVID-19, alien visitation, anti-vaccination, white genocide, climate change, or Jeffery Epstein (Moffitt, King, and Carley 2021;Marcellino et al 2021;Phillips, Ng, and Carley 2022). Most works focus mainly on Tweets as the unit of the study (Moffitt, King, and Carley 2021;Galende et al 2022;Phillips, Ng, and Carley 2022;Mahl, Zeng, and Schäfer 2021). For example, Galende et al (2022) study Tweets explicitly containing the word "conspiracy."…”
Section: Conspiracy Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most works focus mainly on Tweets as the unit of the study (Moffitt, King, and Carley 2021;Galende et al 2022;Phillips, Ng, and Carley 2022;Mahl, Zeng, and Schäfer 2021). For example, Galende et al (2022) study Tweets explicitly containing the word "conspiracy." Phillips, Ng, and Carley (2022) Conspiracy Taxonomy Mahl, Zeng, and Schäfer (2021) used network analysis of co-occurring hashtags in Tweets to assign hashtags into topic groups qualitatively based on their thematic relationship.…”
Section: Conspiracy Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The trained model is then used to identify the class label of new unseen test data. In unsupervised learning, the model automatically finds patterns and relationships in the dataset by creating clusters in it [2]. Reinforcement learning aims to develop a system or an agent that learns from the rewards and punishments received from the environment In document-level sentiment classification, lexical, syntactic, and semantic features in a document are first extracted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%