2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.protcy.2016.08.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Low Power Reconfigurable Encoder for Flash ADCs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Dynamic powerdissipation and leakage power dissipation are 3.42 mW and 5.55 nW, respectively.The comparison of Fat‐Tree encoder with other encoders is presented inTable 7. It can be concluded thatFat‐Tree encoder is faster than MUX based encoder but consumes more power [2, 11, 16, 18]. A modified form of Fat‐Tree encoder is discussed inSection 3.3 exhibiting better performance right leftthickmathspace.5emTFATencoder=n×2n1×INVERTER+2n11+2n2false∑i=0n3122i×NANDgate+2n3false∑i=0n4122i×NORgate3×1+4×false∑i=1n3i+(2n12)(n2)×NANDgate+false∑i=1n3i×NORgate=32×INVERTER+48×NANDgate+8×NORgate19×NANDgate…”
Section: ‐Bit Encodermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dynamic powerdissipation and leakage power dissipation are 3.42 mW and 5.55 nW, respectively.The comparison of Fat‐Tree encoder with other encoders is presented inTable 7. It can be concluded thatFat‐Tree encoder is faster than MUX based encoder but consumes more power [2, 11, 16, 18]. A modified form of Fat‐Tree encoder is discussed inSection 3.3 exhibiting better performance right leftthickmathspace.5emTFATencoder=n×2n1×INVERTER+2n11+2n2false∑i=0n3122i×NANDgate+2n3false∑i=0n4122i×NORgate3×1+4×false∑i=1n3i+(2n12)(n2)×NANDgate+false∑i=1n3i×NORgate=32×INVERTER+48×NANDgate+8×NORgate19×NANDgate…”
Section: ‐Bit Encodermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermometer code is the output of the comparators and is converted to binary code by a binary encoder. Several encoders [7–13] are described in the literature, in which Fat‐Tree encoder [14] exhibits better results as compared to others. For the design of encoders, complementary logic (CML) [15] based gates are efficient in terms of noise but power consumption is more due to extra biasing circuits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various types of ADC architecture have respective advantages and drawbacks. Flash ADCs are the fastest one among these designs because of its simple paralleled structure [3], at a cost of area and power consumption by a huge number of comparators. Because of the huge quantity of comparators, the overall function of flash ADC is largely determined by the performance of comparators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burada yapılan Nyquist A/S dönüştürücü sınıflandırmasına göre de yapıları yüksek hızlı ve tümüyle paralel(flash), katlama ve ara-değerleme(folding-interpolating) ve boru tipi(pipeline) A/S dönüştürücü olarak sınıflandırabiliriz. Özellikle geniş band haberleşme(mobil, kablolu, kablosuz) sistemlerinde, yazılım radyo sistemlerinin sinyal işleme uygulamalarında ve geniş band alıcı-verici sistemlerinde çoğunlukla düşük çözünürlüklü ve yüksek hızlı analog-sayısal dönüştürücüler kullanılmaktadır [3][4][5][6]. Özellikle düşük gecikme süresi ve yüksek örnekleme hızına ihtiyaç duyan sistemler için gerekli olan bir yapıdır [7].…”
Section: Gi̇ri̇ş (Introduction)unclassified