2020 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/ius46767.2020.9251361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Low-Frequency Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer Based on Multi-User MEMS Process with Enhanced Output Pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The photoacoustic center frequencies and bandwidth also showed little variation with DC bias, albeit the photoacoustic bandwidth was higher (69%) than the pitch-catch bandwidth (41%). The higher bandwidth for photoacoustics compared to pitch-catch is due to two factors: First, in pitch-catch ultrasound imaging, spatial resolution is governed by the frequency of the transmitted acoustic wave arriving at the receiver, whereas in photoacoustic imaging, the laser pulses have nanosecond-scale excitation with much wider frequency content [ 27 , 28 ]. Second, the bandwidth for one-direction sound propagation is larger than the two-way bandwidth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The photoacoustic center frequencies and bandwidth also showed little variation with DC bias, albeit the photoacoustic bandwidth was higher (69%) than the pitch-catch bandwidth (41%). The higher bandwidth for photoacoustics compared to pitch-catch is due to two factors: First, in pitch-catch ultrasound imaging, spatial resolution is governed by the frequency of the transmitted acoustic wave arriving at the receiver, whereas in photoacoustic imaging, the laser pulses have nanosecond-scale excitation with much wider frequency content [ 27 , 28 ]. Second, the bandwidth for one-direction sound propagation is larger than the two-way bandwidth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%