2021
DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-20-1024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A large real-world cohort study of examined lymph node standards for adequate nodal staging in early non-small cell lung cancer

Abstract: Background: The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) recommend that surgeons sample is not clear. We aimed to define a minimal number of examined lymph nodes for removal or sampling for optimized nodal staging recommendation, with a focus on T 1-3 N 0 M 0 patients. Methods: A total of 55,101 consecutive patients were selected, including 52,099 patients with US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data and 3,002 patients in a Chines… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(32 reference statements)
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…International standards including those of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) (5), European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) (6,7), Chinese Medical Association (CMA) (8), and American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (COC) (9) differ regarding the optimal number of examined LNs (ELNs). Samayoa et al's retrospective study revealed that the overall survival (OS) of patients with early NSCLC could be significantly improved with at least 10 ELNs (10), and our previous study arrived at the same conclusion (11). Therefore, a minimum of 10 ELNs served as the basis for the hilar and intrapulmonary LNs quantitative standard (HI standard) in the current study.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…International standards including those of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) (5), European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) (6,7), Chinese Medical Association (CMA) (8), and American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (COC) (9) differ regarding the optimal number of examined LNs (ELNs). Samayoa et al's retrospective study revealed that the overall survival (OS) of patients with early NSCLC could be significantly improved with at least 10 ELNs (10), and our previous study arrived at the same conclusion (11). Therefore, a minimum of 10 ELNs served as the basis for the hilar and intrapulmonary LNs quantitative standard (HI standard) in the current study.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…A greater NRN was associated with better long-term survival. Focusing on early NSCLC overall, regardless of the pathological node status, a greater NRN can achieve better OS ( 8 , 26 ). However, there were neither benefits nor adverse effects on the OS when more extensive LND was performed in patients with PCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 161 patients presented with PLNR ≥13%, and 1461 patients presented with PLNR <13%. The median NRN was 7 (95% CI [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. The optimal cut-off value of the NRN for survival was 13 by as determined by X-tile (Figure 2).…”
Section: Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SEER database is currently the largest database of tumor clinical information in the world. Research on tumors based on SEER has revealed many complex problems in tumor clinical practice [14,15]. However, for recent studies using samples collected over a long period in the SEER database, there are many different editions of AJCC guidelines in terms of tumor stage and other indicators, which makes a comparison of results challenging [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%