1999
DOI: 10.1299/jsmeb.42.171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hydrodynamic Study of Active Drag in Swimming.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean passive drag force recorded in this study was 45.9 N. This falls within the range of values reported in previous studies of able-bodied swimmers at the same speed (1.5 m/s), for example, Bixler et al 22 37.2 N; Mason et al 23 43.8 N, Takagi et al 24 59.2 N. However, the range of the drag scores in the current study (24.9–82.8 N) is higher than those typically observed in able-bodied studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The mean passive drag force recorded in this study was 45.9 N. This falls within the range of values reported in previous studies of able-bodied swimmers at the same speed (1.5 m/s), for example, Bixler et al 22 37.2 N; Mason et al 23 43.8 N, Takagi et al 24 59.2 N. However, the range of the drag scores in the current study (24.9–82.8 N) is higher than those typically observed in able-bodied studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Passive drag has been measured by many researchers using experiments with a swimmer in the gliding position (prone position with raised upper limbs) and its coefficient has been found to be around 0.03 (9) . Therefore, in this study, the coefficient of the drag in the tangential direction was identified so that the resultant drag in the simulation representing the experiment agrees with the experimental value.…”
Section: Identification Of Coefficients For Drag Force In Tangential mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this value, the nondimensional passive drag in simulation becomes 0.00904. Using the surface area of the human body 0.609, which is derived from an estimation formula used in Takagi et al (9) , the passive drag coefficient becomes 0.0297 0.03. One reason why C t is a larger value of 0.036 than 0.03 is that the surface area of the human body in the simulation (0.576) is slightly smaller than the estimated value (0.609).…”
Section: Identification Of Coefficients For Drag Force In Tangential mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3,4 Other methods have performed both passive and active swimming experiments to determine active swimming resistance. 5,6 Since it is not possible to measure active resistance directly, these methods rely on assumptions which have been found to influence the predicted resistance. 7 Alternatively, passive resistance can be measured directly and is generally conducted by a handle tow 2,8 or use of a tether in a circulating water channel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%