2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.09.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid FCM-AHP approach to predict impacts of offshore outsourcing location decisions on supply chain resilience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They considered benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks as resilience criteria. López and Ishizaka [15] proposed a coupled method of FCM and AHP for supplier selection for a resilient supply chain. Recently, Jabbarzadeh, Fahimnia and Sabouhi [17] proposed stochastic bi-objective optimization model considering fuzzy c-means to developed sustainable supply chain network that performs resiliently.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They considered benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks as resilience criteria. López and Ishizaka [15] proposed a coupled method of FCM and AHP for supplier selection for a resilient supply chain. Recently, Jabbarzadeh, Fahimnia and Sabouhi [17] proposed stochastic bi-objective optimization model considering fuzzy c-means to developed sustainable supply chain network that performs resiliently.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus it crucial to provide a reliable level of resilience to the supply side to protect such shortages especially during HILP events [9].Several studies have been conducted to consider resilience in the supply chain [8,10,11]. The concept of resilience in specific to the supplier selection problem has also been discussed by several authors [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Most of these studies focused on multiple sourcing and operational performance of suppliers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decision maker tries to locate a set of facilities to satisfy all the demand while taking into account of random facility disruptions. Similar to Snyder & Daskin [13], two types of facilities are considered: (1) unreliable facilities, which are subject to random disruptions; and (2) reliable facilities, which are not subject to random disruptions by additional hardened investment. In order to satisfy the whole demand region, each subregion would be served by allocating a reliable/unreliable facility as its initial allocation, where 1 − q is the probability that the facility is available.…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various risk incidents, e.g., natural disasters, key-supplier bankruptcy, labor strikes, or terrorist attacks, showed that the business environment is becoming more and more uncertain and fragile [8][9][10]. Furthermore, wide spreading global procurement, decentralized production, outsourcing, supplier reduction, minimizing inventory, etc., increased the supply chain vulnerability, and highlighted the importance and urgency of proactive supply chain disruption risk management [11][12][13]. Therefore, the reliable facility location problem (RFLP) with the disruption risk factor considered is an important topic which needs the further investigation of scholars and practitioners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though AHP is commonly used, this algorithm cannot adequately resolve the inherent uncertainties and imprecisions associated with mapping decision maker's perceptions into exact numbers [16]. Hence, numerous previous studies have combined the fuzzy set theory with AHP to solve uncertain issues [26][27][28][29][30][31]. Zhü [32] proposed that fuzzy AHP (FAHP) cannot resolve uncertain questions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%