2020
DOI: 10.3390/electronics9010155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis Framework for Availability and Security Quantification of IoT Infrastructures

Abstract: Modeling a complete Internet of Things (IoT) infrastructure is crucial to assess its availability and security characteristics. However, modern IoT infrastructures often consist of a complex and heterogeneous architecture and thus taking into account both architecture and operative details of the IoT infrastructure in a monolithic model is a challenge for system practitioners and developers. In that regard, we propose a hierarchical modeling framework for the availability and security quantification of IoT inf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• IoHT Infrastructure -[i1]: Pure performance of data transactions between IoT sensors and internal/external clients (e.g., medical professionals, medical physicians, family members) is the main focus of the modeling, therefore the involvement of physical components and their operational availability are minimized. And that, failure and recovery behaviors of components are not considered in the modeling for performance evaluation [33]. -[i2]: Our main focus is (i) to explore the bottleneck in the considered IoHT architecture in realtime medical data transmission, (ii) to explore the impact of configuration alteration in fog and cloud layers on the performance metrics and (iii) to realize the performance-related trade-offs between internal clients at local places and distant clients.…”
Section: C: Assumptions and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• IoHT Infrastructure -[i1]: Pure performance of data transactions between IoT sensors and internal/external clients (e.g., medical professionals, medical physicians, family members) is the main focus of the modeling, therefore the involvement of physical components and their operational availability are minimized. And that, failure and recovery behaviors of components are not considered in the modeling for performance evaluation [33]. -[i2]: Our main focus is (i) to explore the bottleneck in the considered IoHT architecture in realtime medical data transmission, (ii) to explore the impact of configuration alteration in fog and cloud layers on the performance metrics and (iii) to realize the performance-related trade-offs between internal clients at local places and distant clients.…”
Section: C: Assumptions and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the increase in energy efficiency is associated with the need to apply the developed methods and tools with a high level of intellectualization based on the machine learning, artificial neural networks, etc. [36][37][38][39][40], and the synthesis of a multilevel [41] energy efficiency management system at an enterprise should be implemented with the use of system approach.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third criterion is the type of model chosen to evaluate the system. Most papers chose Petri nets [25] and/or with hierarchical models [26] to evaluate their systems. The variation of types observed for the used Petri nets is considerable, ranging from colored Petri nets to Hierarchical Context-Aware Aspect-Oriented Petri nets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%