2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global-scale dataset of direct natural groundwater recharge rates: A review of variables, processes and relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
100
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 192 publications
9
100
2
Order By: Relevance
“…13), in principle recharge has an effect of equal magnitude as transmissivity, but opposite sign. However, the variability of transmissivity of the subsurface is several orders of magnitude, whereas the variability of groundwater recharge is much lower, approximately one order of magnitude in humid regions (Moeck et al, 2020). This results in an overall much more important effect of transmissivity on drainage density.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Drainage Density To Hydrological and Erosion Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13), in principle recharge has an effect of equal magnitude as transmissivity, but opposite sign. However, the variability of transmissivity of the subsurface is several orders of magnitude, whereas the variability of groundwater recharge is much lower, approximately one order of magnitude in humid regions (Moeck et al, 2020). This results in an overall much more important effect of transmissivity on drainage density.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Drainage Density To Hydrological and Erosion Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The official information reports a proportional recharge of 18% approximately [52,53], and remains in the estimated range. In comparison with other studies, Moeck et al [107] provide the relationship between the recharge rate and several variables around the globe. One of According to the model results (Figure 5b, and attached as Supplementary Materials), the annual mean volumes presented values of 2211 hm 3 (with a standard deviation of 510 hm 3 ) for precipitation, 1207 hm 3 (with a standard deviation of 136.7 hm 3 ) for evapotranspiration, and 460 hm 3 (with a standard deviation of 220 hm 3 ) for surface runoff.…”
Section: Current and Future Potential Groundwater Rechargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Groundwater recharge is a complex ecohydrological process that plays an important role to societies as a key strategic water reserve (Wada et al., 2014), and within the environments as a natural or artificial mechanism of groundwater storage renewal (Gleeson et al., 2012). The groundwater recharge connects the atmospheric, surface, and subsurface components of the water balance (Mohan et al., 2018), being mainly controlled by the precipitation amount and intensity, boundary layer climatology, topography, water table level, watershed geomorphology, soil and vegetation characteristics, and irrigation return flow (Jasechko et al., 2014; Moeck et al., 2020). Understanding the seasonal controls upon recharge requires its accurate estimation (Jasechko et al., 2014), which can only be obtained by experimental methods or modelling since the groundwater recharge cannot be directly measured (Melo et al., 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%