Adaptive Hypertext and Hypermedia 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-0617-9_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Glass Box Approach to Adaptive Hypermedia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
32
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Tsandilas and schraefel (2004) suggest sliders as a way for the user to control fragment adaptation. Höök (1996) explored adaptive stretchtext -a specific kind of hypertext where both the user and the system can decide which fragments are hidden or visible.…”
Section: Fragment Indexing: the Case Of Adaptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tsandilas and schraefel (2004) suggest sliders as a way for the user to control fragment adaptation. Höök (1996) explored adaptive stretchtext -a specific kind of hypertext where both the user and the system can decide which fragments are hidden or visible.…”
Section: Fragment Indexing: the Case Of Adaptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To support more complex personalisation, this thesis follows Höök's "black box in a glass box" approach (2000; Höök et al 1996): arguing what is important for scrutinisation is the ability to provide the end user with an understanding of the overall result of the personalisation and how it might be changed to achieve a desired affect, rather than an in-depth understanding of the algorithm. To support this, SASY/ATML allows the content author to provide explanations for complex personalisation rules.…”
Section: Complexity Of Adaptive Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Amazon (www.amazon.com), an AH recommender system that recommends products to consumers, asks users to rate items to indicate their interest in that type of item and provide additional preferences directly by setting up a user profile. A less reliable method of obtaining input to the user model is by observing certain actions performed by the user, such as clicking a link to obtain detail about a topic, as evidence from the user is interested in the topic, as in systems like POP (Höök et al, 1996). 9 Description taken from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubiquitous_computing, accessed 14 th Jan 2006.…”
Section: Input For User Model Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fires the adaptation rules that refer to possible user goals specified in the catalogue. The adaptation rules can, for example, recommend some pages to the user [23], focus user attention on a subset of the hyperspace [69; 198], or adapt content of the selected page [88].The goal/task recognition process is difficult and not precise in general. It is especially difficult in AH and other Web-based system where the flow of information from the user (bandwidth) required by user modeling components is thinner than in traditional desktop systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, several recent projects explored the use of data mining technologies to identify the current user task in an expected sequence of tasks and to provide personalized task-level support [87; 94]. More information about the use of data mining technologies for Web personalization ns provided is Chapter 3 of this book [135].A popular example of goal adaptation is provided by the PUSH system [88]. This system has a small catalogue of user goals and adapts the presentation of each selected page to the current goal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%