2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2010.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A GIS-based neuro-fuzzy procedure for integrating knowledge and data in landslide susceptibility mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
68
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
68
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies can be found in the literature regarding the assessment of landslide susceptibility. For example, Oh et al (2011) applied an adaptive neurofuzzy system (ANFIS) to map the landslide susceptibility (Oh et al, 2011;Gemitzi et al, 2010;Vahidnia et al, 2010). Neuro-fuzzy networks are systems which originate from the union of neural networks and fuzzy inference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies can be found in the literature regarding the assessment of landslide susceptibility. For example, Oh et al (2011) applied an adaptive neurofuzzy system (ANFIS) to map the landslide susceptibility (Oh et al, 2011;Gemitzi et al, 2010;Vahidnia et al, 2010). Neuro-fuzzy networks are systems which originate from the union of neural networks and fuzzy inference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the methodological proposal of this study includes techniques and data obtained from the public domain, the validation of the results of the fuzzy gamma technique was not done through landslide-scar maps, that is, a validation technique commonly used in related studies Dymond et al, 2006;Ercanoglu and Gokceoglu, 2004;Vahidnia et al, 2010). Alternatively, the CPRM risk sectors were used as units of validation, since in Brazil, there are no free data of landslide-scars mapped or monitored.…”
Section: Validation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybrid methods, which are established by combining statistical approaches and artificial intelligence, have also been adopted for assessing geological hazards; these include artificial neural network (ANN)-Bayes analysis [14], ANN-fuzzy logic [26], and neuro-fuzzy inference systems [27,28]. However the ANN-based approaches cannot provide objective and steady assessment results because their outcomes are operator dependent [13,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%