2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00190-016-0903-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A geometry-free and ionosphere-free multipath mitigation method for BDS three-frequency ambiguity resolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EWL ambiguity can be reliably resolved by previous studies [4,6,7], but rapid and reliable WL and NL ambiguity resolution is still challenging because of both ionospheric bias and the combined observation noise [6]. Therefore, the proposed TCAR method focuses on finding a better WL and NL combination method to eliminate ionospheric bias and restrict combined observation noise simultaneously.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…EWL ambiguity can be reliably resolved by previous studies [4,6,7], but rapid and reliable WL and NL ambiguity resolution is still challenging because of both ionospheric bias and the combined observation noise [6]. Therefore, the proposed TCAR method focuses on finding a better WL and NL combination method to eliminate ionospheric bias and restrict combined observation noise simultaneously.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the comparison between GFIF and IFVR is made to demonstrate the necessity of restricting the combinational noise level. The method consists of three cascaded steps, whose combined observations for each step are selected as EWL (φ (0,−1,1) − p(0,1,1)), WL (φ (1,4,−5) − p(1,1,1)), and NL (a1 φ − 0,0)), of which a is corresponding combined factors, referred to by [7,17]. Note that the LAMBDA algorithm is used for the ambiguity resolution of IFVR, GFIF, and GBIR, in which the …”
Section: Performance Of Ambiguity Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With the ODSF algorithm applying corrections to the measurements themselves, there is no reason why it could not be adapted to cope with the di erent ground-track repeat times of these systems, if there is no signi cant change to the environment surrounding an antenna. Indeed, this has been demonstrated for BeiDou in Ye et al (2015) and Chen et al (2016), but only in the context of short-baseline positioning using double-di erenced measurements, not in PPP processing for a single receiver.…”
Section: Future Development Of the Odsf Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%