1991
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.98.3.299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general theory concerning the prenatal origins of cerebral lateralization in humans.

Abstract: The origins of cerebral lateralization in humans are traced to the asymmetric prenatal development of the ear and labyrinth. Aural lateralization is hypothesized to result from an asymmetry in craniofacial development, whereas vestibular dominance is traced to the position of the fetus during the final trimester. A right-ear sensitivity advantage may contribute to a left-hemispheric advantage in speech perception and language functions, whereas left-otolithic dominance may independently promote right-sided mot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
239
4
20

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 416 publications
(279 citation statements)
references
References 387 publications
(604 reference statements)
6
239
4
20
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible mechanism is the position of the infant in utero and its effect on postural and head-orienting behavior of the off-spring. Regarding the intrauterine environment, Previc (1991) proposed that during the last trimester, the fetus is oriented such that its head is projected outward, which places constraints on the movements of the left hand of the fetus because of its proximity to the mother's pelvis and back-bone. From this position, the fetus receives different stimulation of the right otolith compared with the left because of asymmetries in acceleration and deceleration forces associated with bipedal walking by the mother.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible mechanism is the position of the infant in utero and its effect on postural and head-orienting behavior of the off-spring. Regarding the intrauterine environment, Previc (1991) proposed that during the last trimester, the fetus is oriented such that its head is projected outward, which places constraints on the movements of the left hand of the fetus because of its proximity to the mother's pelvis and back-bone. From this position, the fetus receives different stimulation of the right otolith compared with the left because of asymmetries in acceleration and deceleration forces associated with bipedal walking by the mother.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Could pitch differences account for the observed pattern of lateralization? Previc ( 1991 ) suggested that many results indicating left-or right-ear advantages could be explained by differences in absolute frequency, with left-ear advantages for high frequencies (although he was referring to frequencies > 1000 Hz). In a different type of task, righthanded adults showed lateral asymmetries for relative pitch frequency, with a right-ear advantage when target stimuli were relatively higher in pitch compared to the average stimulus presented, and a-left-ear advantage for relatively lower pitch targets (Ivry & Lebby, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, 95% of right-handed and 70% of left-handed individuals have left hemispheric language specialization. 39 If the sample contained individuals with right hemispheric specialization, they would not be sufficient to contaminate the results.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%