2010
DOI: 10.1109/tia.2010.2049810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A General Model for Estimating the Laminated Steel Losses Under PWM Voltage Supply

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A few papers, including [15] and [46], investigate iron losses up to 20 kHz, both reporting an increased loss estimation error with frequency, mainly related to skin effect. The lamination skin depth δ lam is given by:…”
Section: Iron Loss Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few papers, including [15] and [46], investigate iron losses up to 20 kHz, both reporting an increased loss estimation error with frequency, mainly related to skin effect. The lamination skin depth δ lam is given by:…”
Section: Iron Loss Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) Core Loss: The core loss arising from hysteresis, eddy current and excess loss effects is estimated using the Bertotti iron loss model, (5), [21], where f and B are the frequency and peak flux density respectively. The coefficients k h , k e and k a are derived from measured loss data provided by the electrical steel manufacturer.…”
Section: ) Electromagnetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of pulse width modulation (PWM) and non-linear loads results in a difficulty in iron loss prediction in magnetic materials. Although many models, which are based on physical or numerical methods [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], have been proposed by different researchers, predicting iron losses in magnetic materials, when a non-sinusoidal voltage excitation is applied, has not yet been entirely solved and is still an open research field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With various structural arrangements and magnetization inputs applied to electrical machines, estimations of iron losses based on the steel manufacturers' datasheets, which mostly are tested under sinusoidal excitations, will exhibit large deviations from the actual ones. Over the last few decades, models have been established to improve the accuracy of the Steinmetz equation for various excitations, such as MSE (modified Steinmetz equation) [4,[12][13][14], GSE (general Steinmetz equation) [15,16] and iGSE (improved general Steinmetz equation) [17]. MSE uses the change rate of excitations instead of frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation