1995
DOI: 10.1109/20.406552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general formula for prediction of iron losses under nonsinusoidal voltage waveform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analytical models have been proposed to investigate these components that require the identification of parameters. These are dependant on the chemical and physical characteristics of the considered material [25][26][27][28]. Therefore, for sinusoidal supply, the hysteresis losses can be approximated by the following well known equation proposed by Steinmetz [29], where B max is the peak value of the flux density, f the frequency and α the Steinmetz coefficient.…”
Section: A Iron Losses Separation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical models have been proposed to investigate these components that require the identification of parameters. These are dependant on the chemical and physical characteristics of the considered material [25][26][27][28]. Therefore, for sinusoidal supply, the hysteresis losses can be approximated by the following well known equation proposed by Steinmetz [29], where B max is the peak value of the flux density, f the frequency and α the Steinmetz coefficient.…”
Section: A Iron Losses Separation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model separates losses into hysteresis, eddy-current and excess losses. Many attempts have been made to incorporate for harmonic losses into the Bertotti model [42]- [47]. In [44], the authors present a model for prediction of losses under arbitrary input using the Preisach model for improved estimation of minor loops, validated up to 2 kHz switching frequency.…”
Section: Iron Loss Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of pulse width modulation (PWM) and non-linear loads results in a difficulty in iron loss prediction in magnetic materials. Although many models, which are based on physical or numerical methods [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], have been proposed by different researchers, predicting iron losses in magnetic materials, when a non-sinusoidal voltage excitation is applied, has not yet been entirely solved and is still an open research field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…iGSE combines the idea of the MSE and GSE methods. Some variability and correlation of the loss coefficients are introduced, including a form factor [5,6] and equivalent frequency [12,13] coefficients for PWM excitations and a three-order polynomial representation of the hysteresis-loss multiplicative coefficient [4,14,18]. Research papers pointed out that iron loss prediction should depend on frequency, magnitude, change rate and historical values of flux density, as well as other factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%