2012
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2012.2201734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Modeling of Soft Magnetic Properties of Electrical Steels: Application to Stators of Electrical Machines

Abstract: To take account of the uncertainties introduced on the soft magnetic materials properties (magnetic behavior law, iron losses) during the manufacturing process, the present work deals with the stochastic modeling of the magnetic behavior law B-H and iron losses of claw pole stator generator. Twenty eight (28) samples of slinky stator (SS) coming from the same production chain have been investigated. The used approaches are similar to those used in mechanics. The accuracy of existing anhysteretic models has bee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(43 reference statements)
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both cases, 10% variation of the quantities is taken as uncertainty range. The first approach thus describes the propagation of uncertainties from the parameters of the model to the computed losses through the FE simulation and loss model, whereas the second approach describes this propagation from measurements to computations as described in (Ramarotafika et al 2012). The uncertainty itself is quantified using the Sobol indices (Sobol 1993) and the stochastic sensitivity analysis.…”
Section: Stochastic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases, 10% variation of the quantities is taken as uncertainty range. The first approach thus describes the propagation of uncertainties from the parameters of the model to the computed losses through the FE simulation and loss model, whereas the second approach describes this propagation from measurements to computations as described in (Ramarotafika et al 2012). The uncertainty itself is quantified using the Sobol indices (Sobol 1993) and the stochastic sensitivity analysis.…”
Section: Stochastic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both [3] and [4] approached the problem in a forward manner, meaning that the experimentally or analytically determined degraded material properties were input to finiteelement (FE) models as parameters, and the core losses were obtained as the outputs from the models. On the contrary, a stochastic approach was presented in [5], in which probabilistic models were developed for the magnetization curves and iron-loss coefficients of a stator core material by utilizing experimental data from 28 stators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The burrs formed at the edges of the sheets are random in nature and introduce uncertainties in the solution. There are studies done in (Ramarotafika, et al, 2012) where uncertainties due to measurement in permeabilities are considered. The interlaminar resistance distribution due to punching is discussed in (Schmidt & Beiler, 1947) which states that losses due to interlaminar currents are no more than one percent of the total core loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%