2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8ta06950f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A full overview of international standards assessing the long-term stability of perovskite solar cells

Abstract: Perovskite solar cells have emerged as promising candidates for photovoltaics. Passing existing standards is a necessary minimum requirement for a possible commercialisation. Here, we analyse the most current international stability standards and to which degree perovskites have passed them. We then elaborate on the most pertinent challenges for the long-term stability of perovskites in the coming years.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
126
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Long‐term stability (>20 years as has been achieved in the case of Si PV technology) is a second major consideration, which is still a grand challenge for both organic–inorganic hybrid and inorganic PSCs . In particular, CsPbBr 3 perovskite stability under thermal‐stress and light testing conditions is important for solar cell‐operation following the industry relevant protocols . Based on our Review (Section ), CsPbBr 3 shows outstanding improvements regarding thermal and moisture stability when compared with organic–inorganic hybrid perovskites, but it is still far from the thresholds for long‐term stability considerations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Long‐term stability (>20 years as has been achieved in the case of Si PV technology) is a second major consideration, which is still a grand challenge for both organic–inorganic hybrid and inorganic PSCs . In particular, CsPbBr 3 perovskite stability under thermal‐stress and light testing conditions is important for solar cell‐operation following the industry relevant protocols . Based on our Review (Section ), CsPbBr 3 shows outstanding improvements regarding thermal and moisture stability when compared with organic–inorganic hybrid perovskites, but it is still far from the thresholds for long‐term stability considerations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Moreover, for very long-term stability, expelling all organic components may become a requirement. [60,61] Thus, Table 3 also shows fully inorganic Pb-perovskites. These have larger bandgaps (> 1.8eV) and may not be relevant for single-junction solar cells but could become important for light-emitting applications or as the active layer in a multijunction (e.g., two, three, or four junctions) solar cells where higher bandgaps are needed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whist this initial result is promising, perovskite modules will ultimately need to pass the relevant International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) stability standard (IEC 61215); here the most challenging tests include stress testing with repeated thermal cycling (À40 to 85 1C), moisture storage (80% RH), and extended damp heat storage (85 1C + 80% RH). 36,37 Unfortunately, whilst MAPbI 3 has proven easy to process, it is thermally unstable within the expected maximum operating conditions of a solar module. 37 Indeed MAPbI 3 perovskites have also been shown to be unstable due to moisture, 38 and oxygen in combination with light, 39 so ultimately they will require encapsulation to retard degradation.…”
Section: Papermentioning
confidence: 99%