2007
DOI: 10.1598/rrq.42.4.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A formative experiment investigating literacy engagement among adolescent Latina/o students just beginning to read, write, and speak English

Abstract: S The overarching pedagogical goal of this formative experiment was to facilitate engaged reading and writing in a language arts classroom of seventh‐ and eighth‐grade native Spanish speakers who were assigned to a team composed solely of second‐language learners for the entire school year. Fourteen students participated in the study. An intervention was designed to emphasize (a) self‐selected reading and (b) whole‐class and small‐group teacher‐directed reading and writing on high‐interest topics. Initial asse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Teachers should engage students with instructional goals in order to encourage deep and active processing of words and meanings. During extended talk, teachers pose cognitively challenging questions to activate higher order thinking and prompt effective vocabulary growth and reading comprehension (Apthorp, 2006;Ivey & Broaddus, 2007;Kim et al, 2006). Strategies that are based on these recommendations are cited as collaborative strategic reading (CSR) (Kim et al, 2006); instructional conversations (Goldenberg, 2013), cognitive strategy instruction (Hansfield & Jiménez, 2009); language experience approach (LEA) (Dorr, 2006); and direct and extended vocabulary instruction (Coyne et al, 2010).…”
Section: Dialoguementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Teachers should engage students with instructional goals in order to encourage deep and active processing of words and meanings. During extended talk, teachers pose cognitively challenging questions to activate higher order thinking and prompt effective vocabulary growth and reading comprehension (Apthorp, 2006;Ivey & Broaddus, 2007;Kim et al, 2006). Strategies that are based on these recommendations are cited as collaborative strategic reading (CSR) (Kim et al, 2006); instructional conversations (Goldenberg, 2013), cognitive strategy instruction (Hansfield & Jiménez, 2009); language experience approach (LEA) (Dorr, 2006); and direct and extended vocabulary instruction (Coyne et al, 2010).…”
Section: Dialoguementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second approach addresses dialogue between peers and is an important opportunity for ELLs, students with learning disabilities, and socioculturally diverse learners to reflect on ideas and engage with their peers (Apthorp, 2006;Coyne et al, 2010;Ivey & Broaddus, 2007;Medina, 2010;Wohlwend, 2008). Recommended practices include collaborative reading 9 strategies (CSR) (Kim et al, 2006), literature circles (Medina, 2010), reciprocal teaching (Hansfield & Jiménez, 2009), peer-tutoring, book discussions, learning together through inquiry and questioning (Hansen-Thomas & Cavagnetto, 2010;Ivey & Broaddus, 2007;Mahdavi & Tensfeldt, 2013), and peer assisted learning strategies (PALS) (Mahdavi & Tensfeldt, 2013).…”
Section: Dialoguementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Par le fait même, force est de constater la pertinence de l'établissement, en classe, de contextes signifiants d'apprentissage, où les élèves réalisent des apprentissages liés à leur vécu et ayant donc un sens à leurs yeux (Armand, Lê, Combes, Saboundjian et Thamin, 2011;Guthrie, 2004 Par ailleurs, sachant qu'un apprenant bilingue est différent d'un apprenant monolingue (Grosjean, 1989), il apparaît également primordial que les interventions mises en oeuvre auprès d'élèves en situation de GRS prennent en considération d'autres facteurs susceptibles d'influencer leur apprentissage de l'écriture en L2, tels que la prise en compte de leur bagage de connaissances antérieures, linguistiques et culturelles (Genesee, Geva, Dressler et Kamil, 2006;Grant, Wong et Osterling, 2007 (García et Wei, 2014). Ainsi, des recherches empiriques réalisées auprès d'élèves en GRS et mettant à l'essai des interventions légitimant l'utilisation des langues de leur répertoire linguistique tendent à démontrer qu'elles stimulent un engagement dans la littératie 3 chez ces derniers (voir par exemple Ivey et Broaddus, 2007;Armand et al, 2015). Rappelons le rôle clé de l'engagement pour la réussite scolaire des élèves comme souligné, entre autres, par l'OCDE (2011).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified