1964
DOI: 10.2307/2785802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Forced Choice Form of the F Scale-Free of Acquiescent Response Set

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The BF scale is thus multi-factorial at one level and unifactorial at a higher level. This is perhaps reminiscent of the superficially contradictory findings reported by Krug (1961) and Camillieri (1959) on the one hand and Eysenck (1954) on the other. The two American authors found several small factors (small in terms of the number of items loading highly) in the original F scale whereas Eysenck, reporting an analysis of the orighal California data by Coulter, said that there was in the F scale "A strong general factor throughout".…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The BF scale is thus multi-factorial at one level and unifactorial at a higher level. This is perhaps reminiscent of the superficially contradictory findings reported by Krug (1961) and Camillieri (1959) on the one hand and Eysenck (1954) on the other. The two American authors found several small factors (small in terms of the number of items loading highly) in the original F scale whereas Eysenck, reporting an analysis of the orighal California data by Coulter, said that there was in the F scale "A strong general factor throughout".…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…These headings do not however correspond to the factor structure of the scale (Camillieri, 1959;Krug, 196 1 ) . It is not therefore clear whether we should expect the new scale to be more or less multifactorial than the original.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These included measures of heterosexuals' attitudes toward homosexuality (HATH; Larsen, Reed, & Hof£man, 1980), authoritarianism (Berkowitz & Wolkon, 1964), affective orientation toward sexuality (Mosher, 1968), and attitudes toward feminism (Smith, Ferree, & Miller, 1975). Subjects were given extra credit in introductory psychology courses in exchange for their participation.…”
Section: Pretestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The F Scale measures degree of authoritarianism. Berkowitz and Wolkon (1964) indicate that the forced choice technique is one of the best solutions to the acquiescence response set which plagued earlier versions of the F Scale. All other statements to which subjects responded were measured on a five-interval Likert-Like scale ranging from &dquo;Strongly Agree&dquo; to &dquo;Strongly Disagree.&dquo; All subjects responded to this item: &dquo;The use of black models in advertisements other than for blackoriented products has a positive social impact on racial relations in our society.&dquo; Also, every subject responded to: &dquo;Advertisers are highly interested in serving the social needs of the public.&dquo; Only the advertising executive sample was asked to respond to the statements: &dquo;Advertisers, generally, do not use black models in advertisements other than for black oriented products&dquo;; and, &dquo;I would not use black models in advertisements other than for black oriented products.&dquo; [109] Analysis consists of the t-test statistic for independent group mean scorces.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%