1997
DOI: 10.2307/3151899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Feature-Based Approach to Market Segmentation Via Overlapping K-Centroids Clustering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A respondent can belong to several clusters without negatively impacting on the managerial usefulness. Conceptually, one consumer's higher statistical probability to belong to one segment does not necessarily mean that s/he only belongs to this segment [13]. For example, a tourist may well desire more than one attribute or benefit from a destination and hence can belong to multiple groups [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A respondent can belong to several clusters without negatively impacting on the managerial usefulness. Conceptually, one consumer's higher statistical probability to belong to one segment does not necessarily mean that s/he only belongs to this segment [13]. For example, a tourist may well desire more than one attribute or benefit from a destination and hence can belong to multiple groups [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We should stress that the purf)ose here is not to focus on the "descriptive content" of the segmentation literature Sarabia, 19%;Dalgic and Leeuw, 1994;Danneels, 1996;Hammond, Ehrenberg and Goodhardt, 1996;Dibb andStern, 1995 Jedidi, Kohli andDesarbo, 1996;Cohen and Ramaswamy, 1998;Bayus and Mehta, 1995;Ramaswamy, Chattcrjec and Cohen, 1996;Walker and Damicn, 1999;Ramaswamy, Chatterjcc and Cohen, 1999;Kamakura and Wedcl, 1995;Kamakura and Mazzon, 1991;Desarbo, Ramaswamy and Chatterjee, 1995;Hagerty, 1993;Vriens. Wedel and Wilms, 1996;Krieger and Green, 1996;Allenby, Arora and Ginter, 1998;Chaturvedi, Carroll, Green and Rotondo, 1997;Lastovicka, Murray and Joachimsthaler, 1990;Novak and de Leeuw, 1992;ter Hofstede, Steenkamp and Wedel, 1999;Trivedi, 1999;Bucklin and Gupta, 1998;Bucklin, Gupta and Han, 1995;Allenby andGinter, 1995 Kucukemiroglu, 1999;Kamakura and Novak, 1992;Novak and MacEvoy, 1990;Botschcn, Thelen and Pieters, 1999;van Raaij and Verhallen, 1994;Cooper and Inoue, 1996;Kara and Kaynak, 1997;Schlegelmilch, Bohlen and Diamantopoious, 1996;Tepper, 1994;Firat and Scbuiz, 1997;…”
Section: The Paradigm Funnelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can operate online and thus may be used to classify customers by processing samples of unlimited size (such as a steady influx of scanner data). This gives them an advantage over other K-means extensions like the overlapping K-centroids approach proposed by Chaturvedi et al (1997).…”
Section: Neural Network Reduction Techniques For Condensing Three-waymentioning
confidence: 99%