2002
DOI: 10.1007/s004040100179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A favorable outcome of pregnancies in women with primary and secondary recurrent pregnancy loss associated with antiphospholipid syndrome

Abstract: The fetal and maternal outcome of pregnancies in patients with primary and secondary recurrent pregnancy loss associated with antiphospholipid syndrome were virtually identical and quite satisfactory. Intravenous immunoglobulin added to the standard therapy resulted in excellent fetal and maternal outcome, although its definitive role will have to wait for the outcome of randomised trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[21] The fetal outcome of pregnancy in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss associated with APS was virtually identical and quite satisfactory. [22] In some cases, the women with recurrent pregnancy loss did not have positive aCL. The absence of aCL and aPS in patients with recurrent abortion is comparable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[21] The fetal outcome of pregnancy in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss associated with APS was virtually identical and quite satisfactory. [22] In some cases, the women with recurrent pregnancy loss did not have positive aCL. The absence of aCL and aPS in patients with recurrent abortion is comparable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This may serve as a diagnostic tool as part of the routine workup for women with idiopathic RSA, and also has therapeutic implications, evidenced by the utility of combining intravenous immunoglobulin in the standard therapy regimen, which allegedly resulted in excellent fetal and maternal outcome (Branch et al 2000), in particular in cases of APS (Diejomaoh et al 2002). However, the definitive utility of this treatment modality awaits the outcome of international randomized trials, which are currently in progress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were limitations in both meta-analyses [113,114]; these arise from the design and quality of the studies and the small number of patients in the trials included in the second meta-analysis [114]. The live birth rate of 82% reported in a Kuwait study [115] in which patients with RSM and APS were treated with LDA, unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is comparable to the above result of 74 and 79% reported in the AOCG Practice Bulletin [116] where LMWH was combined with LDA. Two smaller studies [117,118] have not reported any significant differences in pregnancy outcome with the combination therapy using unfractionated heparin and LDA and LMWH and LDA in patients with RSM associated with APS.…”
Section: Treatment Of Rsmmentioning
confidence: 99%