2019
DOI: 10.3390/en12214131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fast CFD-Based Methodology for Determining the Cyclic Variability and Its Effects on Performance and Emissions of Spark-Ignition Engines

Abstract: A methodology for determining the cyclic variability in spark-ignition (SI) engines has been developed recently, with the use of an in-house computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code. The simulation of a large number of engine cycles is required for the coefficient of variation (COV) of the indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP) to converge, usually more than 50 cycles. This is valid for any CFD methodology applied for this kind of simulation activity. In order to reduce the total computational time, but witho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stability of an internal combustion engine operation related to the non-repeatability of the subsequent operating cycles and ignition misfiring can be assessed based on variation of IMEP 35 and also on the basis on variation of the maximal combustion pressure -COV pmax . [36][37][38] Figure 6 presents the coefficients of ). The results correspond to the tests carried out in Test 0 and Test 1, described in Table 1.…”
Section: Engine Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The stability of an internal combustion engine operation related to the non-repeatability of the subsequent operating cycles and ignition misfiring can be assessed based on variation of IMEP 35 and also on the basis on variation of the maximal combustion pressure -COV pmax . [36][37][38] Figure 6 presents the coefficients of ). The results correspond to the tests carried out in Test 0 and Test 1, described in Table 1.…”
Section: Engine Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stability of an internal combustion engine operation related to the non-repeatability of the subsequent operating cycles and ignition misfiring can be assessed based on variation of IMEP 35 and also on the basis on variation of the maximal combustion pressure -COV pmax . [36][37][38] Figure 6 presents the coefficients of variation of the maximal combustion pressure determined for the analysed engine loads (35%, 60% and 100%) for the engine fuelled only with diesel (reference fuel) and DF with WAS (Figure 6(a)) and the dispersion of the maximum pressure value in individual engine operating cycles around the mean values of p max , determined for 200 engine operating cycles (Figure 6(b)). The results correspond to the tests carried out in Test 0 and Test 1, described in Table 1.…”
Section: Engine Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of the design results was mainly based on the coefficient of variation, that is, the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean called the coefficient of variation, which is recorded as the coefficient of variance (C V ) [26,27]. The acceptance criteria for the final result of the CFD simulation optimization: Ammonia injection grille (AIG) upstream velocity distribution: the maximum C V was 15%; (2) The upstream temperature field distribution of the first-layer catalyst: the maximum deviation of the flue gas temperature ratio from the average value was within the range of ±10 • ; (3) The upstream of the first-layer catalyst velocity distribution: the maximum C V in the cross section was 15%; (4) The upstream velocity angle of the firstlayer catalyst: the maximum angle deviated from the vertical line was ±10 • ; and (5) The upstream ammonia distribution (NH 3 /NO x ) of the first-layer catalyst: the maximum C V was 5%.…”
Section: Design Results Evaluation Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The essential of IMEP parameters has also been studied by several researchers in some other related topics [18], [20], [21]. These studies show the needs of IMEP assessment in determining engine performance characteristics.…”
Section: Effective Pressure and Indicated Meanmentioning
confidence: 95%