2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2010.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fast and robust patient specific Finite Element mesh registration technique: Application to 60 clinical cases

Abstract: Abstract. Finite Element mesh generation remains an important issue for patient specific biomechanical modeling. While some techniques make automatic mesh generation possible, in most cases, manual mesh generation is preferred for better control over the sub-domain representation, element type, layout and refinement that it provides. Yet, this option is time consuming and not suited for intraoperative situations where model generation and computation time is critical. To overcome this problem we propose a fast… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, they are the most common choice when creating computational grids for biomechanical models of living tissues. 18 It has been reported in the literature that high quality tetrahedral meshes can be created using readily available mesh generators. 20,34,68 However, for continua with complicated geometry, quality control of tetrahedral meshes can be a challenge 68,92 and varies according to the mesh generation method employed.…”
Section: Automatic Approach: Tetrahedral Mesh Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, they are the most common choice when creating computational grids for biomechanical models of living tissues. 18 It has been reported in the literature that high quality tetrahedral meshes can be created using readily available mesh generators. 20,34,68 However, for continua with complicated geometry, quality control of tetrahedral meshes can be a challenge 68,92 and varies according to the mesh generation method employed.…”
Section: Automatic Approach: Tetrahedral Mesh Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When applying our mesh matching algorithm (Bucki et al 2010) to this foot model and to patients' medical datasets (such as CT scans), new models, including the FE model and the bony structures, can be created and can undergo FE simulation in Artisynth. This allows us to perform a patient-specific study of influence of the different orthoses and potentially to choose which is the most appropriate for a patient.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The face soft tissues are thus modeled as a single entity, without distinctions between dermis layers, fat, muscles and mucosa. To overcome these limitations, our group has proposed a methodology called the Mesh-Match-and-Repair algorithm (Couteau et al, 2000 ;Bucki et al, 2010) consisting first, in manually defining a structured 3D mesh, in order to build one "generic" model of the face. Emphasis is given to the design of the generic mesh, so that the elements inside the mesh can be associated to anatomical entities (dermis layers, fat, muscles, mucosa…).…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%