2019
DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2019051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fast 3-D ultrasound projection imaging method for scoliosis assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies refer to a fast 3-D ultrasound projection imaging method for scoliosis assessment (Jiang et al, 2019); optimal management of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescence (Kotwicki et al, 2013); recovery kinetics following spinal deformity correction: a comparison of isolated cervical, thoracolumbar, and combined deformity morphometries (Passis et al, 2019); scoliosis in patients with Friedreich ataxia: results of a consecutive prospective series (Simon et al, 2019), The "Risser+" grade: a new grading system to classify skeletal maturity in idiopathic scoliosis (Troy et al, 2019); effectiveness of physical exercises in the treatment of scoliosis (Vutan et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies refer to a fast 3-D ultrasound projection imaging method for scoliosis assessment (Jiang et al, 2019); optimal management of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescence (Kotwicki et al, 2013); recovery kinetics following spinal deformity correction: a comparison of isolated cervical, thoracolumbar, and combined deformity morphometries (Passis et al, 2019); scoliosis in patients with Friedreich ataxia: results of a consecutive prospective series (Simon et al, 2019), The "Risser+" grade: a new grading system to classify skeletal maturity in idiopathic scoliosis (Troy et al, 2019); effectiveness of physical exercises in the treatment of scoliosis (Vutan et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method, reconstruction was performed, and the complete spine data were projected to obtain the coronal image. It was reported that the FUPI can greatly decrease the processing time (15.07 ± 0.03 s for FUPI vs. 130.31 ± 35.07 s for the conventional method) 28 . However, this method is still an off‐line imaging method and cannot be used in a situation where immediate feedback is needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was reported that the FUPI can greatly decrease the processing time (15.07 ± 0.03 s for FUPI vs. 130.31 ± 35.07 s for the conventional method). 28 However, this method is still an off‐line imaging method and cannot be used in a situation where immediate feedback is needed. To solve this problem, a real‐time imaging method was developed in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a non‐planar re‐slicing approach, where the skin surface is the reference for a slicing plane, the VPI method obtains an averaged intensity of all voxels of the volumetric image at a specified depth to form an image in the coronal plane. Jiang et al., 10 developed a 9‐times faster coronal image generation approach than original VPI method by skipping the unnecessary 3D reconstruction and directly mapping the B‐mode images and their corresponding positional data. Another method suggested by Vo et al., 11 creates the 3D spine reconstruction compounded from segmented bony features, which allows them to choose the plane of maximum curvature for coronal image projection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%