The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ultrasound scanning for scoliosis assessment: Robotic versus manual

Abstract: Background Ultrasound (US) imaging for scoliosis assessment is challenging for a non‐experienced operator. The robotic scanning was developed to follow a spinal curvature with deep learning and apply consistent forces to the patient's back. Methods Twenty three scoliosis patients were scanned with US device both, robotically and manually. Two human raters measured each subject's spinous process angles on robotic and manual coronal images. Results The robotic method showed high intra‐ (ICC > 0.85) and inter‐rat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25 With robotic scanning, the system performance has better reliability and reputability. 28 The proposed robotic system also provides a stable force control around 5 N, keeping regular contact with the skin surface compared to manual scanning. 15 The robot-assisted system achieves smooth scanning with constant speed over the complex back contour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 With robotic scanning, the system performance has better reliability and reputability. 28 The proposed robotic system also provides a stable force control around 5 N, keeping regular contact with the skin surface compared to manual scanning. 15 The robot-assisted system achieves smooth scanning with constant speed over the complex back contour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurately determining the extent of curvature through mechanical measurements can be challenging for physicians due to individual anatomical differences. In addition, traditional methods are subject to human error, leading to result inconsistencies [5]. Low-quality images and variations in patient's posture and positioning during scans influence scoliosis assessments.…”
Section: No Angle In Degreesmentioning
confidence: 99%