A factor analytic study of several measures of self-concept.

Strong, Donald J.

doi:10.1037/h0044863

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Supplementary Measures1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Year Published

1963

1971

Publication Types

Select...

Article3

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent3

Authors

Journals

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The absence of scores for ideal self-concept in Factor I, coupled with the emergence of a fifth factor that picked up the tendency of Ss to rate extravagantly, suggested that the evaluation element reflects the favorableunfavorable weighting of the items. The results associated with Factor I are consistent with the research of Strong (1962), in which a similar factor was extracted on which the identical four test variables loaded in the same order.…”

Section: Supplementary Measuressupporting

confidence: 86%

Factor analytic approach to the structural differentiation of description.

Stimson¹

1968

Journal of Counseling Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Supplementary Measuressupporting

confidence: 86%

Factor analytic approach to the structural differentiation of description.

Stimson¹

1968

Journal of Counseling Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…(Farson, 1961;Lesser, 1961;Renzaglia, Henry & Rybolt, 1962;Shlien, Mosak, & Dreikurs. 1962;Strong, 1962;Williams, 1962).…”

unclassified

Some concomitants of selfideal discrepancy measures of self-acceptance.

Kinkler¹,

Myers²

1963

Journal of Counseling Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study attempted to further the knowledge of self-acceptance by analyzing the data from 2 multiple correlations, computed between 2 self-acceptance measures, Butler-Haigh Q sort and the Index of Adjustment and Values, and 4 other variables, the Taylor Manifest Anxiety Scale, the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale, the Couch-Kenniston Yeasay-Naysay Scale and the Bass Social Acquiescence Scale. The following conclusions appear warranted: (a) Self-acceptance is not an independent trait; anxiety and response bias measures accounted for over one-half of the variance of the self-acceptance measures, (b) The measure of manifest anxiety correlated more highly with both self-acceptance instruments than the 2 self-acceptance instruments correlated with each other; (c) Caution is advised for researchers who use self-acceptance measures without adequate attention to construct validity.

show abstract

Effect of Social Desirability and Self-Concept Scores on the Measurement of Adjustment

McCarthy

Rafferty²

1971

Journal of Personality Assessment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A factor analytic study of several measures of self-concept.

Cited by 3 publications

References 12 publications

Factor analytic approach to the structural differentiation of description.

Factor analytic approach to the structural differentiation of description.

Some concomitants of selfideal discrepancy measures of self-acceptance.

Effect of Social Desirability and Self-Concept Scores on the Measurement of Adjustment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About