A dynamic Bayesian Markov model for health economic evaluations of interventions in infectious disease

Abstract

BackgroundHealth economic evaluations of interventions in infectious disease are commonly based on the predictions of ordinary differential equation (ODE) systems or Markov models (MMs). Standard MMs are static, whereas ODE systems are usually dynamic and account for herd immunity which is crucial to prevent overestimation of infection prevalence. Complex ODE systems including distributions on model parameters are computationally intensive. Thus, mainly ODE-based models including fixed parameter values are presented in the literature. These do not account for parameter uncertainty. As a consequence, probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA), a crucial component of health economic evaluations, cannot be conducted straightforwardly.MethodsWe present a dynamic MM under a Bayesian framework. We extend a static MM by incorporating the force of infection into the state allocation algorithm. The corresponding output is based on dynamic changes in prevalence and thus accounts for herd immunity. In contrast to deterministic ODE-based models, PSA can be conducted straightforwardly. We introduce a case study of a fictional sexually transmitted infection and compare our dynamic Bayesian MM to a deterministic and a Bayesian ODE system. The models are calibrated to simulated time series data.ResultsBy means of the case study, we show that our methodology produces outcome which is comparable to the “gold standard” of the Bayesian ODE system.ConclusionsIn contrast to ODE systems in the literature, the dynamic MM includes distributions on all model parameters at manageable computational effort (including calibration). The run time of the Bayesian ODE system is 15 times longer.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-018-0541-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Quantifying the economic cost of antibiotic resistance and the impact of related interventions: rapid methodological review, conceptual framework and recommendations for future studies

“…Dynamic effects, such as time delays and feedback loops, can be captured with transmission dynamic models [45,78], dynamic Bayesian Markov models [79] or by including lagged covariates into regression analysis. Transmission dynamic models capture the effect of interventions on onward transmission and competition between susceptible and resistant bacterial strains, and can be used to track changes in ABR prevalence over time.…”

Simplified Mathematical Modelling of Uncertainty: Cost-Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines in Spain

“…A further constraint comes from the fact that economic evaluations of infectious disease interventions are often based on predictions from systems of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) or Markov models, either static or, more typically, dynamic ones that consider herd immunity, which is crucial to avoid overestimation of infection prevalence [58][59][60], although other approaches are possible [61]. Our simplified model may be criticized for not following that trend.…”

Economic and epidemiological evaluation of text message-based interventions in patients with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus

“…This is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that served as a basis for the development of a dynamic cohort model with Markov states to compare the standard treatment (isolated medical visits) for HIV-infected people versus the alternative strategy (medical visits and sending text messages). The Markov model is indicated for use in dynamic models of transmission of infectious diseases, since this model is capable of simulating interactions among human beings and how these interactions affect the spread of a disease, HIV in the case of this study, throughout time ( 16 ) . In addition, this model allows for the inclusion of details relevant to the spread of these diseases, such as different mortality rates, birth rates, and probability of infection according to the severity of the pathology ( 16 ) .…”