1994
DOI: 10.1097/00006199-199411000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Digital Test for Pelvic Muscle Strength in Women with Urinary Incontinence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
1
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
76
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…24 Two studies investigated the inter-rater reliability of other palpation scoring systems, with squeeze pressures ranging from moderate to high (r=0.60 to r=0.90). 25,26 Our findings suggest that the correlation coefficient is questionable with respect to MVC (r=0.57) and muscle endurance (r=0.55). Likewise, previous studies have shown weak inter-rater reliability for the Oxford Grading Scale using Cohen's Kappa (0.37) 17 and moderate inter-rater reliability for the Peritron manometer.…”
Section: Baseline Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…24 Two studies investigated the inter-rater reliability of other palpation scoring systems, with squeeze pressures ranging from moderate to high (r=0.60 to r=0.90). 25,26 Our findings suggest that the correlation coefficient is questionable with respect to MVC (r=0.57) and muscle endurance (r=0.55). Likewise, previous studies have shown weak inter-rater reliability for the Oxford Grading Scale using Cohen's Kappa (0.37) 17 and moderate inter-rater reliability for the Peritron manometer.…”
Section: Baseline Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…It is different than previously published techniques of examination [Brink et al, 1994;Sampselle et al, 1989;Worth et al, 1986]. Previous studies have generally employed a scale assessing three characteristics: pressure, duration and displacement in plane [Brink et al, 1994;Sampselle et al, 1989].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…6,7,9,11 Several methods have been used to analyze pelvic floor function and dysfunction in women, including digital palpation and intravaginal devices, such as a perineometer, to assess muscular function and ability to generate pressure. [12][13][14][15][16][17] But few studies refer to such methods in the evaluation of the PFM during pregnancy and puerperium. 4,6,7,18 Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of the PFMT during pregnancy in a population of nulliparous pregnant women, using a perineometer and digital examination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%