1981
DOI: 10.1016/0004-6981(81)90272-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A determination of the sources of airborne particles collected during the regional air pollution study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
37
1
3

Year Published

1984
1984
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
9
37
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Correlations are weaker for C1, Cu, and Cd, but they are definitely present, and Cr and Fe are probably present. Previous studies (Greenberg In Table 7 we compare our results with those of target-transformation factor analysis (TTFA) studies of the July/August 1976 data at Station 112 by Alpert and Hopke (1981) and with in-stack studies of municipal incinerators by Greenberg et al (1978a,b) and Olmez et al (1987). There is reasonably good agreement between the results of WTA and TTFA for several elements: C1, K, Ni, Zn, and Pb.…”
Section: Refuse Incinerationmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Correlations are weaker for C1, Cu, and Cd, but they are definitely present, and Cr and Fe are probably present. Previous studies (Greenberg In Table 7 we compare our results with those of target-transformation factor analysis (TTFA) studies of the July/August 1976 data at Station 112 by Alpert and Hopke (1981) and with in-stack studies of municipal incinerators by Greenberg et al (1978a,b) and Olmez et al (1987). There is reasonably good agreement between the results of WTA and TTFA for several elements: C1, K, Ni, Zn, and Pb.…”
Section: Refuse Incinerationmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…There is strong evidence for including Mn in the component and modest evidence for V, Ni, Zn, Cr, and K. Support for the remaining elements is weak or nonexistent. Some are listed because of their inclusion in iron-andsteel components of Alpert and Hopke (1981) or Small (1979), shown for comparison. Except for Fe, Mn, and K, correspondence of our component with Alpert and Hopke's is not striking, probably because TTFA has more difficulty than our method in distinguishing contributions from colocated sources.…”
Section: Iron-and-steel Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of signatures of sources in St. Louis obtained by TTFA (Alpert and Hopke, 1981) and wind trajectory analysis indicates a similar smearing of signatures by TTFA among sources that are located in the same general direction with respect to the receptor. In cases of large ambient data sets that include extensive meteorological data (especially wind direction), the smearing problem aay be avoided by selectively applying TTFA to only the samples collected under specified wind conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…이러한 측정망의 경우 일반적으로 3일 또는 6일 간격으로 24시간 동안 입자상물질에 대한 시료 를 채취하고 있다 (Solomon and Sioutas, 2006). 미국 Gatz (1978), Alpert and Hopke (1981), Liu et al (1982), Chang et al (1988), Rheingrover and Gordon (1988), 그리고 Glover et al (황인조 등, 2008). 참 고 문 헌…”
Section: 국의 경우 Frm (Federal Reference Method) 측정망unclassified