2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11113-008-9073-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Demographic Analysis of the Rise in the Prevalence of the US Population Overweight and/or Obese

Abstract: Using data from the National Health Interview Survey for years spanning 1976 to 2001, this paper presents an age-period-cohort analysis of weight gain throughout the life cycle. We find that while all ages experienced an increase in the proportion overweight and/or obese (PO&O), the PO&O of young adults has grown at a faster rate than that of older age groups. We find that the increases in Body Mass Index are primarily due to period effects, not cohort or age effects. From the ordered logistical regression ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among whites and younger black women aged 25–44, the less educated continue to be more likely to be obese than college graduates, but the differentials are larger for women than men, and weak or nonexistent among black men and older black women aged 45–64. The stability and persistence of educational differences contrast with previous claims that obesity differentials have declined over time, and the most rapid increase in obesity has occurred with the most educated (3,4,5,7,12). Given the heterogeneities between college graduates and nongraduates (unchanged among men but widening among younger women), lumping them together as done previously (3,4,12) is perhaps unwise, biasing downward estimates of educational differences and leading to spurious trends.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Among whites and younger black women aged 25–44, the less educated continue to be more likely to be obese than college graduates, but the differentials are larger for women than men, and weak or nonexistent among black men and older black women aged 45–64. The stability and persistence of educational differences contrast with previous claims that obesity differentials have declined over time, and the most rapid increase in obesity has occurred with the most educated (3,4,5,7,12). Given the heterogeneities between college graduates and nongraduates (unchanged among men but widening among younger women), lumping them together as done previously (3,4,12) is perhaps unwise, biasing downward estimates of educational differences and leading to spurious trends.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Incongruous classifications of education could be another issue. The NHIS results suggest significant and increasing distinctions between college graduates and nongraduates (5,6,7), but this distinction was not made in all previous studies. In the NHANES analyses (3,4), education was classified into low (<9 years of schooling), medium (9–12 years of schooling) and high levels (at least some college).…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…6% in 19636% in -19656% in to an estimated 17.4% in 20036% in -20046% in (Ogden et al 2008. Most past research on obesity focused on its measurements and determinants in the general population or in age-specific, ethnic-specific, or gender-specific sub-populations (Kuczmarski and Brownson 2007;Cook and Daponte 2008;Baum 2007;Hendricks et al 2006;Jalongo 1999;Hawkins 2007). However, more recent research focuses on the health and labor market outcomes of the rising incidence of unhealthy body mass index (BMI) among adolescents (Gary et al 2006;Merten et al 2008;Fletcher and Lehrer 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%