2005
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-30982005000200011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A demografia brasileira e o declínio da fecundidade no Brasil: contribuições, equívocos e silêncios

Abstract: , aos quais agradecem. Obviamente, nem todas foram incorporadas ao trabalho, cuja responsabilidade cabe unicamente aos autores.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
15

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
22
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…However, such effects are debated and balanced by other schools of thought 13 , with migration considered to be an important factor for heterogeneous aging among different regions 14 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such effects are debated and balanced by other schools of thought 13 , with migration considered to be an important factor for heterogeneous aging among different regions 14 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Além disso, um conjunto de políticas governamentais gerou mudanças culturais de grande difusão espacial, provocando a institucionalização da demanda por uma regulação da fecundidade, tais como o crédito ao consumidor, de telecomunicações, de previdência social e de atenção à saúde (Carvalho e Brito, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Were there no evidences of women's desire for fertility control at that time? As Carvalho and Brito (2013) asserted, the results of the 1970 Demographic Census and the 1972 and 1976 PNAD, would come with an enormous surprise because all demographers, Brazilian and even some Latin Americans, could not believe that fertility was declining because of a commonly believed truth: "there was no widespread demand in the country for the reduction in the number of children and, consequently, for contraception" (CARVALHO; BRITO, 2013, p. 359). Although fertility was declining, some theories were put forward to explain why large families made sense in the political, cultural and economical context (PAIVA, 1987).…”
Section: The Historical Resistance To Family Planning Programs Implemmentioning
confidence: 99%