A Cross-Sectional Survey to Assess Biorisk Management System in Research and Diagnostic Laboratories in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

Abstract

Financial, cultural, and managerial hurdles have made biosafety and biosecurity measures difficult in resource-constrained countries like Pakistan. Because of increasing awareness of biorisk management, diagnostic and research laboratories have made major advances in biosafety and biosecurity in the recent decade. As a result, identifying and addressing gaps in biorisk management has never been more critical. The purpose of this study was to assess the current situation of personal protective equipment (PPE), biosafety behavior, waste management, biosafety and biosecurity measures, training and safety, and health services in diagnostic and research laboratories across Pakistan's Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) province. We adapted the WHO Laboratory Assessment tool (2012) and CWA 15793 (Biorisk management guidelines) for conducting a cross-sectional survey, which was distributed among various laboratories in KP. The survey included 30 laboratories, including 11 diagnostic and 19 research laboratories. In comparison to diagnostic laboratories, biorisk management practices in research laboratories were better in terms of PPE, biosafety behavior, waste management, biosafety measures, biosecurity measures, trainings, and safety and health services. KP laboratories' biorisk management practices have improved over time, according to our findings. However, we were able to identify inadequacies that would require considerable improvements to the current setups based on the WHO and CWA 15793 recommendations. Organizations can tailor their biosafety measures and training to address identified gaps using the presented KP snapshot.

Bio-Risk Management Systems: Biosafety Assessment in COVID-19 Referral Hospitals in Indonesia

“…Organizations must continually improve the effectiveness of their BRM systems via the use of policies, objectives, self-audit programs, audit results, data analysis, risk assessments, corrective and preventive actions, and management reviews [23]. Corrective actions must be taken in the event of an incident, including identifying personnel responsible for the accident/incident reporting system.…”

Assessment of Biosafety Practices in Clinical Laboratories in Khartoum State, Sudan

“…There must be a continuous effort on the part of laboratories to ensure that their testing procedures are safe and in line with international best practices for safety of staffs, patients and safeguard to the environment from potentially hazardous pathogens [2]. To avoid any kind of acquired laboratory infection as well as spreading of these kinds of infection which are not only hazardous agent but also have potential to infect the personnel from the recent viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 as well Ebola virus, the diagnostic labs and research centers must uphold a safe and healthy environment [3].…”