2022
DOI: 10.4236/jbm.2022.1011008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Biosafety Practices in Clinical Laboratories in Khartoum State, Sudan

Abstract: Background: Several related accidents occur in the laboratories due to insufficient regulation, inappropriate implementation of safety measures or unawareness attitude and practice toward safety precaution. Biosafety is a tool through which we are managing safety and security related to any kinds of hazards that may be either to the human, animals, plants and environment as well. We can implement good laboratory practice to minimize the risk while performing any kind of test procedures, either handling to the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results including date, time, procedure and receiver 25% Total average 30.50% Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies (Adam, 2019). There are no findings in the current study area that reveal defects in medical laboratory work from aspects related to the parts of total quality; such as the non-conforming design, the lack of safety procedures (Alam, 2022), the management of clinical samples, the poor training and continuous education of laboratory personnel, and the absence of internal and external quality concepts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Results including date, time, procedure and receiver 25% Total average 30.50% Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies (Adam, 2019). There are no findings in the current study area that reveal defects in medical laboratory work from aspects related to the parts of total quality; such as the non-conforming design, the lack of safety procedures (Alam, 2022), the management of clinical samples, the poor training and continuous education of laboratory personnel, and the absence of internal and external quality concepts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%