2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2017.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critique of reliability prediction techniques for avionics applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A common criticism for handbook based models is that they do not consider interactions of components but only single-component faults. However, faults due to single-component failures are not dominant [15,4,6,1,11]. As a result the actual field reliabilties can deviate from the predicted ones by orders of magnitude [10].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A common criticism for handbook based models is that they do not consider interactions of components but only single-component faults. However, faults due to single-component failures are not dominant [15,4,6,1,11]. As a result the actual field reliabilties can deviate from the predicted ones by orders of magnitude [10].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Stress-and damage models are in general more accurate than handbook based methods. However, the development of such methods requires more effort [15]. Instead of assessing the system on the component level, some approaches use a top-down approach in which the field-reliability of new systems is estimated from field-data of similar systems in operation [8,9].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most popular standards for this was the American Military Standard MIL217-F [5] but other industrial standards such as Telcordia SR-332 [6] and Siemens SN29500 exist as well. The large discrepancy between calculated and actual lifetime, estimated from field returns, has turned research towards the Design for Reliability (DfR) approach [7][8][9][10], based on Physics of Failure (PoF) models. Furthermore, handbook models such as MIL217-F have been discontinued and are thus not applicable for new components and new packages, e.g., for emerging technologies such as GaN and SiC transistors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been a hot and difficult topic to evaluate the health and reliability of electronic equipment in service, especially for electronic equipment in critical system. Health refers to the extent of degradation or deviation from normal conditions [2], based on which the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) can be estimated. Prognostics, as the main content of prognostics and health management (PHM), involves real-time monitoring of health indicators such as current, voltage and strain of electronic devices, based on which the damage of those devices can be estimated and their RULs can be calculated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%