1971
DOI: 10.1080/00223891.1971.10119629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critical Review of the Shading Responses in the Rorschach I: Scoring Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The process underlying shading responses would require close observation of characteristics inside the inkblot, while the process underlying achromatic color responses would not. Hence, these results could be considered experimental evidence to support claims that achromatic and shading responses should be handled as different types of responses in Rorschach scoring (Campo & de Santos, 1971;Exner, 2003;Klopfer & Davidson, 1962/1964.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The process underlying shading responses would require close observation of characteristics inside the inkblot, while the process underlying achromatic color responses would not. Hence, these results could be considered experimental evidence to support claims that achromatic and shading responses should be handled as different types of responses in Rorschach scoring (Campo & de Santos, 1971;Exner, 2003;Klopfer & Davidson, 1962/1964.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…On the contrary, several other methods treat achromaticity and shading as similar concepts (e.g., black as roughly equal to dark) and integrate the two characteristics (e.g., Phillips & Smith, 1953;Piotrowski, 1957Piotrowski, /1980. Campo and de Santos (1971), in a review of shading and achromatic color responses, emphasized differences in perceptive experiences between these two responses and indicated that interpretations derived from the two responses are different. This idea strongly influenced the Comprehensive Rorschach System (Exner, 2003), which is currently in the mainstream of Rorschach use.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Confusion was upon the land. For example, a major review of shading scoring (Campo & De Santos, 1971, p. 6ff) noted that none of the major systems define or score these responses with any consistency, going so far as to note that Binder’s (1959) “scoring is not always consistent with his theoretical definitions,” lamenting the internal and external confusion created by his work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%