2020
DOI: 10.1002/biot.201900228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critical Review of Genome Editing and Synthetic Biology Applications in Metabolic Engineering of Microalgae and Cyanobacteria

Abstract: Being the green gold of the future, microalgae and cyanobacteria have recently attracted considerable interest worldwide, for their metabolites such as lipids, protein, pigments, and bioactive compounds have immense potential for sustainable energy and pharmaceutical production capabilities. In the last decades, the efforts attended to enhance the usage of microalgae and cyanobacteria by genetic manipulation, synthetic and metabolic engineering. However, the development of photoautotrophic cell factories have … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 261 publications
0
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As a powerful toolbox for genome editing and regulation, CRISPR systems are highly valued not only for model microorganisms (e.g., E. coli, S. cerevisiae), but also provide more applicable perspectives for non-model microorganisms that are difficult to be processed through traditional methods. Despite CRISPR/Cas systems have already been applied in plenty of microbial hosts (Freed et al, 2018;Raschmanova et al, 2018;Palazzotto et al, 2019;Wang and Coleman, 2019;Ng et al, 2020), it is still challenging to construct CRISPR system with high editing efficiency, and/or apply various CRISPR strategies in non-model microorganisms. In particular, lessons have also been learned that several limitations should be overcome to enable the multiplexed /genome-scale processing of CRISPR in non-model microorganisms, such as the delivery of gRNAs or Cas proteins, the genotoxic stress, etc.…”
Section: Adaption Of Crispr/cas System To Non-model Microorganismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a powerful toolbox for genome editing and regulation, CRISPR systems are highly valued not only for model microorganisms (e.g., E. coli, S. cerevisiae), but also provide more applicable perspectives for non-model microorganisms that are difficult to be processed through traditional methods. Despite CRISPR/Cas systems have already been applied in plenty of microbial hosts (Freed et al, 2018;Raschmanova et al, 2018;Palazzotto et al, 2019;Wang and Coleman, 2019;Ng et al, 2020), it is still challenging to construct CRISPR system with high editing efficiency, and/or apply various CRISPR strategies in non-model microorganisms. In particular, lessons have also been learned that several limitations should be overcome to enable the multiplexed /genome-scale processing of CRISPR in non-model microorganisms, such as the delivery of gRNAs or Cas proteins, the genotoxic stress, etc.…”
Section: Adaption Of Crispr/cas System To Non-model Microorganismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, four genes were successfully edited through the expression of codon-optimized Cas9 gene and corresponding single guide RNA (sgRNA). However, the constitutive expression of Cas9 shows cytotoxic effect in C. reinhardtii that reduce the cell viability of transformants (Ng et al, 2020 ). Therefore, the transient delivery of in-vitro assembled Cas9/sg RNA ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex via electroporation is a promising methodology to efficiently edit genes in C. reinhardtii without the cytotoxic effect of Cas9, and this approach was established recently (Shin et al, 2016a ; Baek et al, 2016a ).…”
Section: Advancement In the Resources For Microalgal Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, biofuel production from biomass of microalgal and cyanobacterial native strains (3rd generation biofuel) or their genetically modified improved strains (4th generation biofuel) has become a promising alternative to conventional biofuel production in recent years (Fig. 6 ) (Chen et al 2019a ; Mata et al 2010 ; Ng et al 2020 ; Rajneesh et al 2017 ).
Fig.
…”
Section: Biofuel Feedstocks Affect Food Energy and Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%