2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2003.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A continuous flow system for assessing fluoride release/uptake of fluoride-containing restorative materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the materials tested in the present study, Vitremer released the highest amount of fluoride. The larger pore size and greater porosity of RMGIC in comparison to GIC may explain the difference in the initial leaching of fluoride from the glass particles 18 , and the type and amount of resin used in photochemical polymerization may also affect fluoride release rates 20 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the materials tested in the present study, Vitremer released the highest amount of fluoride. The larger pore size and greater porosity of RMGIC in comparison to GIC may explain the difference in the initial leaching of fluoride from the glass particles 18 , and the type and amount of resin used in photochemical polymerization may also affect fluoride release rates 20 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another benefit of the fluoride coatings lies in the form of fluorine released. In the ion chromatography data, only the free fluorine ion was detected without the presence of any complex forms, which is in contrast to the resin‐based orthodontic materials where the fluoride was also released in the form of complexes 20–22. Only the free fluorine ions are known to be effective in imparting resistance to secondary caries, because they can be taken up easily into the tooth structure and transform hydroxyapatite into fluorapatite 23…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The final results were reported as fluoride release rate (μg/cm 2 /day) by taking into account the surface area and solution volume of each specimen using the following equation,[20] where 0.1256 cm 2 is the surface area of the material tested.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%