A content analysis of studies published in the field of augmented reality in education

TURHAN, Mahmut Emre; Metin, Mustafa; Çevik, Ebru Ezberci

doi:10.31681/jetol.925340

Cited by 6 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The analysis yielded a discernible outcome indicating that the number of the studies increased each year. Differently than Kapucu and Yıldırım's (2019) results, Turhan et al (2022) found that majority of the studies were conducted on the field of science education.…”

Section: Purpose Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 69%

“…Over the last few decades, AR technologies and their applications to education have burgeoned throughout various fields in Turkey as in the world. Consequently, several systematic reviews have been conducted to investigate the picture of AR usage in a Turkish context (Kapucu & Yıldırım, 2019;Korucu, Ustan and Yavuzaslan, 2016;Turhan, Metin and Ezberci-Çevik, 2022). Among those studies, the parameters of Kapucu and Yıldırım's (2019) review were the years between 2010 and 2018.…”

Section: Purpose Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In a very recent review (Turhan et al, 2022), in turn, 87 academic studies that were published in Turkish national journals between the years of 2012 and 2020 were analysed. In their review study, Turhan et al (2022) analysed the AR studies using the parameters of publication year, aim of the study, field, research methods used, participants and instruments for data collection. The analysis yielded a discernible outcome indicating that the number of the studies increased each year.…”

Section: Purpose Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In order to identify the current trends, such studies should be conducted periodically (Turhan et al, 2022). One of the many other reasons to conduct review studies is to reveal which aspects of the field have been explored and how, and which aspects of the field need more attention (Hart, 1998).…”

Section: Purpose Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Augmented Reality Within the Past Five Years in Turkey: A Systematic Review

Derinalp

2023

Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Teaching, Learning and Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study provides a systematic review of the literature on augmented reality (AR) focusing on the last five years in the Turkish context. Web of Science was used as the database. 'Augmented reality', 'Turkey' or 'Turkish', 'Education Educational Research' were applied as search parameters. The results were limited within the past five years (between 2018 and the first seven months of 2022). During the first run of the search 54 studies appeared, however, when analysed closely, it was found that five of those studies did not meet the search criteria. Hence, this study synthesises a set of 49 studies. Qualitative content analysis is adopted to investigate the general view of augmented reality research in Turkey. The studies were analysed based on the changes by years, fields that they were conducted in, methods that were used, and the aspects that they focused. The findings suggest that 2019 was the year with the most publications. Another finding of this systematic review was that almost %40 of the publications among the given parameters were in the Science field. When it comes to the methods, it seemed that the quantitative research method was the most popular among the analysed publications. It was interesting to see that most of the studies focused on investigating the effectiveness of AR in spite of the vastness of the studies claiming its benefits. This study encourages researchers to investigate more about different aspects of AR such as how to decrease if not fully overcome the barriers that AR users face or how to integrate AR better to the current teaching-learning process in order to enhance the learning experiences. This study also invites researchers to adopt different research methods than mere quantitative ones in order to have a deeper understanding of AR in educational use.

show abstract

Section: Purpose Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 69%

Section: Purpose Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Purpose Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Purpose Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Augmented Reality Within the Past Five Years in Turkey: A Systematic Review

Derinalp

2023

Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Teaching, Learning and Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Achievement tests are among the most commonly used data collection tools in recent studies on the use of AR technology in other education fields (Arıcı et al, 2019;Kara, 2018;Sırakaya & Alsancak Sırakaya, 2020;Turhan et al, 2022). However, when examining the data in Table 5, it can be seen that achievement tests were not used in any studies.…”

Section: Distribution Of the Studies According To The Data Collection...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Content analysis of music education studies related to augmented reality technology

APAYDINLI

2023

Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to examine the studies scanned in Web of Science and Scopus databases between 2006-2020 on the use of augmented reality applications in music education in terms of their descriptive features, methodological features, and outcomes, and to reveal the trends in this field. The criterion sample approach was utilized in this qualitative study, and 35 selected studies were reviewed using the publication classification form and analyzed using the content analysis method. The descriptive and methodological feature data were translated into frequency values using the SPSS 22 program and then interpreted using tables and charts for easy comprehension. Furthermore, the advantages and limitations of AR applications utilized in music education, which were the research's outputs, were coded, organized into relevant categories, and interpreted. The results showed that most studies focused on piano and guitar education for beginners; no studies were undertaken on wind instruments or voice training. Studies, particularly in recent years, have focused on user experience research. Furthermore, it was found that AR applications have the advantages of increasing and facilitating student learning performance, making learning exciting and fun, and providing motivation. Some challenges during use, owing to technical issues and limited field content in the programs, resulted in limited improvements in music education.

show abstract