2012
DOI: 10.1021/ja205632t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Connection between the Binding Properties of Imprinted and Nonimprinted Polymers: A Change of Perspective in Molecular Imprinting

Abstract: In the current paradigm about molecular imprinting, the imprinted binding sites exist as a consequence of the polymerization process around templates, and the properties of non-imprinted polymers (NIPs) has been largely overlooked. Thus, nothing can be affirmed a priori on the binding properties of NIPs. We propose an alternative view where the imprinting effect is due to the presence of a template molecule which enhances the pre-existing binding properties of a polymer. If a NIP shows no binding properties to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
74
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
9
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report where such monomer similarity was a primary concern. The search for a suitable functional monomer common to both approaches began with the pyridine core, on the basis of previous works where methacrylic imprints for S-NAP were prepared using vinyl pyridine as functional monomer [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: The Common Functional Monomer Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report where such monomer similarity was a primary concern. The search for a suitable functional monomer common to both approaches began with the pyridine core, on the basis of previous works where methacrylic imprints for S-NAP were prepared using vinyl pyridine as functional monomer [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: The Common Functional Monomer Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A low increase in the signal can be observed for the NIP electrode due to non-specific adsorption of TC molecules on the surface of the polymer. The lower current density obtained in the case of the NIP electrode can be due to a more compact film covering the electrode surface in the absence of TC (Baggiani et al, 2012).…”
Section: Mip and Nip Sensor Responsesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…5, curve c), and the current intensity is only about 8% of that of GR/MIPs modified electrode. The significantly stronger response of GR/MIPs modified electrode toward the template molecule demonstrated that GR/ MIPs composite has a larger number of binding sites than GR/NIPs, which should be attributed to the imprinting effect [33]. In addition, we also compared the DPV current response of GR/MIPs with the control MIPs (Fig.…”
Section: Electrochemical Performance Of Gr/mips and Gr/nipsmentioning
confidence: 99%