2012
DOI: 10.1080/10556788.2011.577773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A concave optimization-based approach for sparse portfolio selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a classical portfolio optimization problem where Q and μ are the covariance matrix and mean of n possible assets, respectively, and e T x ≤ 1 is a resource constraint; see, e.g., [6,10]. To create test examples, we take the same randomly generated data Q, μ, ρ, and u which were used by Frangioni and Gentile in [13] and which are available at their Webpage [14].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a classical portfolio optimization problem where Q and μ are the covariance matrix and mean of n possible assets, respectively, and e T x ≤ 1 is a resource constraint; see, e.g., [6,10]. To create test examples, we take the same randomly generated data Q, μ, ρ, and u which were used by Frangioni and Gentile in [13] and which are available at their Webpage [14].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The local minimizers x 1 and x 2 were each found in approximately 6 % of the runs. For the remaining 8 % of the initial points, SNOPT mostly ended up in x 5 . Then, we applied the same method to the problem from Example 2, now choosing x 0 randomly from OE0; 2 3 .…”
Section: Some Numerical Illustrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following [17], we consider a classical portfolio optimization problem min x∈R n x T Qx s.t. μ T x ≥ ρ, e T x ≤ 1, 0 ≤ x ≤ u, x 0 ≤ s, (5.1) where Q and μ are the covariance matrix and the mean of n possible assets and e T x ≤ 1 is the budget constraint, see [12,20]. We generated the test problems using the data from [24], considering s = 5, 10, 20 for each dimension n = 200, 300, 400, which resulted in 270 test problems, see also [17].…”
Section: Portfolio Optimization Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%