1971
DOI: 10.1109/tsmc.1971.4308319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Computer-Based Learning System for Remote Manipulator Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(This is very similar to Sacerdoti's procedural nets.) Freedy (1971) and Albus (1973) have both designed learning systems which observe the human operator's control of the arm and look for patterns of motion which can be automatically executed. The explicit command of arm motion appears to be a more practical alternative.…”
Section: A Successful Embodiment Of the Frame Theory Is Noah (Nets Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(This is very similar to Sacerdoti's procedural nets.) Freedy (1971) and Albus (1973) have both designed learning systems which observe the human operator's control of the arm and look for patterns of motion which can be automatically executed. The explicit command of arm motion appears to be a more practical alternative.…”
Section: A Successful Embodiment Of the Frame Theory Is Noah (Nets Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For several years, Freedy, Weltman and others at Perceptronics have experimented with computer-aids to manipulation, One method (Freedy et al, 1971) used was a learning system (ACS) which observed the human operator's motion of the manipulator, If the motion was repetitive enough, the computer could make (with varying degrees of confidence) a prediction of what the next motion was going to be, take over control from the operator, and execute the most likely trajectory.…”
Section: Use Of Proximity Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Book et al [52], Cook [53], Freedy et al [54], Hardin et al [55], Ji-Ping and De Diana [56], Kaltenborn et al [57], Linstead [58], Mendiburo and Biswas [59], Mevarech [60], Milne and Rowe [61], Morris [62], Pagano et al [63], Pizzutilo and Tangorra [64], Porta [65], Rowe and Gregor [66], Sambrook et al [67], Semerikov et al [68], Shubin et al [69], Sleeman and Hartley [70], Tait and Hughes [71], Wegner et al [72] and others have studied the creation and implementation of computer-based learning systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research into the automatic detection of conditions in which the computer takes over from the human operator, and vice versa, has not yet reached an advanced level (Jolly, 1982;Freedy and Weltam, 1972;Freedy et al, 1971;Corliss and Johnsen, 1968;Sheridan and Ferrell, 1974). By simplifying the issue somewhat, the computer can be said to intervene in three main ways, when the substitution function is activated:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%