In a complex visual vigilance task lasting 1 br., Ss in 5 experimental groups were rewarded for correct detections and punished either (or missed targets or for false alarms Ss in a control group performed the task without possibility of reward or punishment 3 levels of monetary incentive were used as rewards The major results of the study indicated that (a) some combinations of reward and punishment facilitated detection performance while others did not, and (b) Ss punished for missed targets performed better than Ss punished for false alarms. Implications for vigilance research and theory arc discussed.
This visual wgilance study simulated an industrial inspection task in which Ss were alerted to possible targets by a semiautomatic detection device. 1 experimental firoup wab forewarned of possible targets by a buzzer with 1-sec I'oreperiod and rested between alerting signals A 2nd experimental group worked on a problem-solving secondary task instead of resting between buzzes A control group observed the display continuously Other variables of interest were sex of observer, target type, and size of display window It was found that (a) performance by alerted groups was far superior to that of controls and continued to improve throughout the task; (b) a vigilance decrement was not in evidence in any condition; (c) the problem-solving task did not interfere with detection performance; (d) male and female Ss performed equally well; (e) Ss engaged in the problem-solving task greatly underestimated the duration of the detection task and reported it "interesting" while the other groups estimated duration accurately and indicated boredom.
Review of the vigilance literature of the past two decades reveals that the results of most studies have questionable application to industrial inspection tasks for which they were, in part, designed to investigate. It is concluded that: (1) little or no evidence exists indicating that the oft-found decrement in the laboratory has a parallel in the industrial (or military) setting; (2) motivational variables may comprise the key to explaining the decrement and general law level of performance; (3) the decrement may be an artifact arising from a general failure of subjects to follow experimental instructions; and (4) many characteristics of inspection tasks bear little resemblance to those of vigilance tasks. These conclusions are supported by a body of evidence which can no longer be ignored by the serious investigator seeking to understand vigilance behavior and expecting to generalize his results. Redirection of vigilance research and greater experimental control are emphasized.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.