2016 International Conference on Recent Trends in Information Technology (ICRTIT) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icrtit.2016.7569559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computational model for trust and reputation relationship in social network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Faruk and Arnab proposed a trust management model which will take factors like direct, indirect and global trust of the service to find out the final trust value of the service. They take the trust path distance into consideration while calculating the indirect trust [24]. Li et al [25] propose two trust models to content delivery network: a local trust model and a cross-domain trust model.…”
Section: Related Work a Trust Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Faruk and Arnab proposed a trust management model which will take factors like direct, indirect and global trust of the service to find out the final trust value of the service. They take the trust path distance into consideration while calculating the indirect trust [24]. Li et al [25] propose two trust models to content delivery network: a local trust model and a cross-domain trust model.…”
Section: Related Work a Trust Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(23). G, is trust network graph established by direct trust links and G is a subgraph of G. (24). PR u a ,u b , is propagation trust of two users where there is no direct trust.…”
Section: Sentiment Similarity and Trust Related Definitions A Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such definition cannot lay claim to completeness, since notions of trust and reputation as applied to peculiarities of Internetbased activities must be defined in a more context-specific way. Among other things, Alam & Paul define trust as «a belief, the trusting agent has in the trusted agent's willingness and capability to deliver the services that they are mutually agreed on in a given context and in a given time slot» [13]. In addition, Wang & Vassileva associate term 'trust' with «a peer's belief in another peer's capabilities, honesty and reliability based on its own direct experiences» [14].…”
Section: Trust and Reputation What Is The Difference Between These Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [14], reputation is defined as «peer's belief in another peer's capabilities, honesty and reliability based on recommendations received from other peers». On the other hand, already cited above Alam & Paul propose to consider reputation as «aggregation of all recommendations provided by the third-party recommendation agents about the quality of the trusted agent» [13]. Abdul-Rahman & Hailes define reputation as «an expectation about an agent's behavior based on information about its past behavior» [16].…”
Section: Trust and Reputation What Is The Difference Between These Tmentioning
confidence: 99%