2005
DOI: 10.1021/ac0511142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Retention Time Alignment Algorithm To Enhance Chemometric Analysis of Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Separation Data

Abstract: A comprehensive two-dimensional (2D) retention time alignment algorithm was developed using a novel indexing scheme. The algorithm is termed comprehensive because it functions to correct the entire chromatogram in both dimensions and it preserves the separation information in both dimensions. Although the algorithm is demonstrated by correcting comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC x GC) data, the algorithm is designed to correct shifting in all forms of 2D separations, such as LC x LC, LC x CE,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
102
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
102
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from the contour plots (1000 s in the 1 D and 2 s in the 2 D, as indicated above) are divided in quadrants and the values used represents the sum of the areas/pixels from each quadrant. Due to this fact, retention time alignment could be precluded, since the expected highest average standard deviation, considering slightly differences in temperature and pressure programs, of the first and second columns retention times (1.2 s and 0.0035 s, respectively) [31] are correspondently relatively low −0.12% of the period of time considered in the 1 D (1000 s) and 0.18% of the period of time considered in 2 D (2 s). The issue here is, in fact, to consider for each quadrant a surface, defined by the retention times on the 1 D and 2 D, sufficiently high in order to dilute any deviation on both dimensions of a particular compound.…”
Section: Data Validation-anova Tukey Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Data from the contour plots (1000 s in the 1 D and 2 s in the 2 D, as indicated above) are divided in quadrants and the values used represents the sum of the areas/pixels from each quadrant. Due to this fact, retention time alignment could be precluded, since the expected highest average standard deviation, considering slightly differences in temperature and pressure programs, of the first and second columns retention times (1.2 s and 0.0035 s, respectively) [31] are correspondently relatively low −0.12% of the period of time considered in the 1 D (1000 s) and 0.18% of the period of time considered in 2 D (2 s). The issue here is, in fact, to consider for each quadrant a surface, defined by the retention times on the 1 D and 2 D, sufficiently high in order to dilute any deviation on both dimensions of a particular compound.…”
Section: Data Validation-anova Tukey Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complex and time consuming task of identifying all the data obtained by GC × GC/ToF-MS is simplified considerably. This methodology was never applied before, as far as we know, although it has already been considered to be an evident application for pattern analysis obtained after a GC × GC experiment [31]. Using this quick and user friendly methodology, one can reduce drastically the amount of data needed for fingerprint characterization.…”
Section: Principal Components Analysis (Pca)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, these two methods only can be used to align small regions of interest in the two-dimensional data set and they both require a standard as a point of reference. Recently, Pierce et al proposed an alignment algorithm that can correct the entire chromatogram in both GC dimensions [14]. The algorithm used a novel indexing scheme together with a piecewise retention time alignment algorithm [15][16][17], in which one chromatogram is used as the target and other chromatograms aligned to it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, alignment with respect to both m/z and retention time is a prerequisite for quantitative comparison of proteins/peptides by LC-MS. Alignment algorithms have traditionally been used on data points and/or feature vectors of fixed dimension (5). Applications of these algorithms for LC-MS data alignment have been reported in the literature (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). The most common approaches for aligning LC-MS data are based on the identification of landmarks or structural points (referring to the unique charge species in data) and the use of internal standards, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%