2019
DOI: 10.1108/ijwis-04-2018-0027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive framework for evaluating web services composition methods

Abstract: Purpose Web services composition engineering (WSCE) is a big challenge because of the increasing complexity, openness and extensibility of services based on the information system (IS). In the absence of an adequate framework for IS engineering, the authors assume that the overall problem is consequently no longer easy to resolve. This paper aims to explore some of the issues underlying WSCE through a framework, which is built based on the state of the art. The proposed framework is structured around five view… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(134 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And other methods mainly focus on QoS prediction, while how to perform service recommendations based on QoS prediction is not explored in detail. 21,22,29 To consider the users' QoS constraints (i.e., Response Time, Failure Rate, Availability, etc.) for service recommendation, Wang et al 30 proposed a method based on locality-sensitive hashing and cover tree to select items and use their topic information to optimize the final recommended list.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…And other methods mainly focus on QoS prediction, while how to perform service recommendations based on QoS prediction is not explored in detail. 21,22,29 To consider the users' QoS constraints (i.e., Response Time, Failure Rate, Availability, etc.) for service recommendation, Wang et al 30 proposed a method based on locality-sensitive hashing and cover tree to select items and use their topic information to optimize the final recommended list.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, neither the utility‐based methods nor Skyline‐based methods consider the personalized QoS constraints. And other methods mainly focus on QoS prediction, while how to perform service recommendations based on QoS prediction is not explored in detail 21,22,29 …”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A process paradigm such as agile works at the level of practices, whereas SOA functions at an architectural level [30]. In order to integrate SOA and agile strategies for service creation, advocates of SOA and agile integration argue that the SOA architecture and the guiding principles of agile approaches are complementary [31,32]. Some experts believe that SOA-based systems are not created like traditional ones [21].…”
Section: Literature Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SOA is an architectural framework and follows a set of principles, whereas agile is a process model and works at practice level [31]. Based on this view, advocates of SOA and agile integration suggest that one way of combining them is to use SOA framework and guiding principles of agile practices for service development [32,33]. Some researchers also claim that SOA based systems are developed and deployed differently from traditional Systems [21].…”
Section: Literature Studymentioning
confidence: 99%