2022
DOI: 10.1109/tmc.2020.3017176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comprehensive and Reproducible Comparison of Clustering and Optimization Rules in Wi-Fi Fingerprinting

Abstract: Wi-Fi fingerprinting is a well-known technique used for indoor positioning. It relies on a pattern recognition method that compares the captured operational fingerprint with a set of previously collected reference samples (radio map) using a similarity function. The matching algorithms suffer from a scalability problem in large deployments with a huge density of fingerprints, where the number of reference samples in the radio map is prohibitively large. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative study of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The matching can be based on various Machine Learning (ML) approaches. The most commonly used fingerprinting algorithm is the k-Nearest Neighbours (kNN) algorithm [60]. FP methods have been addressed in detail in [59], a book dedicated to all aspects involved in FP-based positioning, navigation, and user tracking.…”
Section: User Location Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matching can be based on various Machine Learning (ML) approaches. The most commonly used fingerprinting algorithm is the k-Nearest Neighbours (kNN) algorithm [60]. FP methods have been addressed in detail in [59], a book dedicated to all aspects involved in FP-based positioning, navigation, and user tracking.…”
Section: User Location Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the proposed method in [92] selects RSSI and CSI as hybrid fingerprint data based on correlation coefficient, so as to construct a reliable fingerprint database, then deep learning approach is applied to further improve the accuracy. In addition, another work [93] provides a comprehensive comparison of existing clustering models in fingerprinting. The authors applied two aggregated normalized metrics as well as 16 heterogeneous datasets to evaluate the accuracy and computational cost of the clustering methods such as C-means clustering and Affinity Propagation Clustering (APC), with regard to conventional clustering methods as KNN and K-means.…”
Section: Machine Learning (Ml)-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leaves the RM as the only input that can increase the computational cost of the system. For larger spaces, the number of samples in the RM may increase, however, this problem can be minimized by applying a clustering or filtering technique [30] which allows the reduction of RM search in large areas without compromising the accuracy. As reported in [30] there are techniques that effectively reduced the RM size while improving the accuracy in some cases.…”
Section: Computational Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%